A speed camera on the Potomac River Freeway in Washington, D.C., has issued nearly $5.9 million in fines during the first half of 2024.

In 2015, Mayor Muriel Bowser launched the “Vision Zero” initiative to tackle the rising number of traffic fatalities and injuries.

Since then, hundreds of speed cameras and automated stop-sign violation detectors have been installed as a key part of this program.

As the city’s main approach to traffic enforcement, these penalties can range from $100 to $500.

The Potomac River Freeway camera, installed in January 2023, surpassed the Interstate-295 camera near Exit 1, which previously led in the amount coming in from fines at nearly $3.9 million, Axios reported.

According to that report, the district’s top 10 speed cameras issued a total of $27.7 million in fines, with two on K Street at Washington Circle accounting for $4.2 million.

As part of the “Vision Zero” initiative, the Department of Public Works launched a pilot program in April that has towed nearly 70 cars with over $600,000 in unpaid tickets and targeted more than 700 vehicles representing nearly $1.6 million in fines.

“Drivers who ignore citations endanger all roadway users by fostering a culture of disregard for our laws,” DPW Director Timothy Spriggs said.

“Identifying and impounding vehicles that have racked up significant fines can be complex, but our scofflaw search teams are getting results and are getting these vehicles off of our streets,” he added.

In February, the Council of the District of Columbia approved a bill granting the district’s attorney general the ability to bring civil lawsuits against drivers with outstanding fines, aiming to address its challenges in effectively collecting these penalties.

The bill also allowed the city to install speed-restricting devices on cars with serious violations.

As of June, the city had installed 477 speed cameras. Residents are now seeking more, according to the Washington Post.

However, Republicans are pushing to ban automated traffic enforcement, including speed cameras.

Despite the rise in fines and the addition of new cameras, traffic fatalities hit a 16-year-high last year.

Crash Fatalities – Washington D.C. by Ailin Vilches

The city has also decreased police traffic enforcement, partly due to a 13% reduction in police staffing from 2018 to 2023.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

These automated cameras are expected to yield over $1 billion over the next four years, with revenue declining over time as people get used to them.

“We would love to see lower revenue from tickets, because that would mean more drivers are obeying traffic laws and our streets are getting safer,” “Vision Zero” director Charlie Willson told the Washington Post.

2024-08-01 21:16:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2F3107815%2Ftraffic-speed-camera-dc-top-revenue-generator%2F?w=600&h=450, A speed camera on the Potomac River Freeway in Washington, D.C., has issued nearly $5.9 million in fines during the first half of 2024. In 2015, Mayor Muriel Bowser launched the “Vision Zero” initiative to tackle the rising number of traffic fatalities and injuries. Since then, hundreds of speed cameras and automated stop-sign violation detectors,

A speed camera on the Potomac River Freeway in Washington, D.C., has issued nearly $5.9 million in fines during the first half of 2024.

In 2015, Mayor Muriel Bowser launched the “Vision Zero” initiative to tackle the rising number of traffic fatalities and injuries.

Since then, hundreds of speed cameras and automated stop-sign violation detectors have been installed as a key part of this program.

As the city’s main approach to traffic enforcement, these penalties can range from $100 to $500.

The Potomac River Freeway camera, installed in January 2023, surpassed the Interstate-295 camera near Exit 1, which previously led in the amount coming in from fines at nearly $3.9 million, Axios reported.

According to that report, the district’s top 10 speed cameras issued a total of $27.7 million in fines, with two on K Street at Washington Circle accounting for $4.2 million.

As part of the “Vision Zero” initiative, the Department of Public Works launched a pilot program in April that has towed nearly 70 cars with over $600,000 in unpaid tickets and targeted more than 700 vehicles representing nearly $1.6 million in fines.

“Drivers who ignore citations endanger all roadway users by fostering a culture of disregard for our laws,” DPW Director Timothy Spriggs said.

“Identifying and impounding vehicles that have racked up significant fines can be complex, but our scofflaw search teams are getting results and are getting these vehicles off of our streets,” he added.

In February, the Council of the District of Columbia approved a bill granting the district’s attorney general the ability to bring civil lawsuits against drivers with outstanding fines, aiming to address its challenges in effectively collecting these penalties.

The bill also allowed the city to install speed-restricting devices on cars with serious violations.

As of June, the city had installed 477 speed cameras. Residents are now seeking more, according to the Washington Post.

However, Republicans are pushing to ban automated traffic enforcement, including speed cameras.

Despite the rise in fines and the addition of new cameras, traffic fatalities hit a 16-year-high last year.

Crash Fatalities – Washington D.C. by Ailin Vilches

The city has also decreased police traffic enforcement, partly due to a 13% reduction in police staffing from 2018 to 2023.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

These automated cameras are expected to yield over $1 billion over the next four years, with revenue declining over time as people get used to them.

“We would love to see lower revenue from tickets, because that would mean more drivers are obeying traffic laws and our streets are getting safer,” “Vision Zero” director Charlie Willson told the Washington Post.

, A speed camera on the Potomac River Freeway in Washington, D.C., has issued nearly $5.9 million in fines during the first half of 2024. In 2015, Mayor Muriel Bowser launched the “Vision Zero” initiative to tackle the rising number of traffic fatalities and injuries. Since then, hundreds of speed cameras and automated stop-sign violation detectors have been installed as a key part of this program. As the city’s main approach to traffic enforcement, these penalties can range from $100 to $500. The Potomac River Freeway camera, installed in January 2023, surpassed the Interstate-295 camera near Exit 1, which previously led in the amount coming in from fines at nearly $3.9 million, Axios reported. According to that report, the district’s top 10 speed cameras issued a total of $27.7 million in fines, with two on K Street at Washington Circle accounting for $4.2 million. As part of the “Vision Zero” initiative, the Department of Public Works launched a pilot program in April that has towed nearly 70 cars with over $600,000 in unpaid tickets and targeted more than 700 vehicles representing nearly $1.6 million in fines. “Drivers who ignore citations endanger all roadway users by fostering a culture of disregard for our laws,” DPW Director Timothy Spriggs said. “Identifying and impounding vehicles that have racked up significant fines can be complex, but our scofflaw search teams are getting results and are getting these vehicles off of our streets,” he added. In February, the Council of the District of Columbia approved a bill granting the district’s attorney general the ability to bring civil lawsuits against drivers with outstanding fines, aiming to address its challenges in effectively collecting these penalties. The bill also allowed the city to install speed-restricting devices on cars with serious violations. As of June, the city had installed 477 speed cameras. Residents are now seeking more, according to the Washington Post. However, Republicans are pushing to ban automated traffic enforcement, including speed cameras. Despite the rise in fines and the addition of new cameras, traffic fatalities hit a 16-year-high last year. Crash Fatalities – Washington D.C. by Ailin Vilches The city has also decreased police traffic enforcement, partly due to a 13% reduction in police staffing from 2018 to 2023. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER These automated cameras are expected to yield over $1 billion over the next four years, with revenue declining over time as people get used to them. “We would love to see lower revenue from tickets, because that would mean more drivers are obeying traffic laws and our streets are getting safer,” “Vision Zero” director Charlie Willson told the Washington Post., , , https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Potomac-River-Freeway.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Ailin Vilches Arguello,

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) suggested Russia’s willingness to participate in the prisoner swap with the United States was influenced by their fear about a potential second Trump administration.

“We certainly want these Americans to come back home. It was ridiculous that they were in prison to begin with,” Vance said in an interview with CNN.

Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich and former Marine Paul Whelan are among the prisoners being released from Russian custody.

“We have to ask ourselves: Why are they coming home? And I think it’s because bad guys all over the world recognize Donald Trump’s about to be back in office, so they’re cleaning house,” Vance said. 

“That’s a good thing, and I think it’s a testament to Donald Trump’s strength.”

This swap marked the first such exchange since December 2022, when basketball player Brittney Griner was released in exchange for Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout.

According to the Turkish presidential office, more than two dozen prisoners were exchanged, including people from the U.S., Germany, Poland, Slovenia, Norway, Russia, and Belarus.

“This deal would not have been made possible without our allies. They stood with us,” President Joe Biden said during a White House briefing. 

“For anyone who questions whether allies matter, they do. They matter. Today is a powerful example why it’s vital to have friends in this world. Our alliances make our people safer,” Biden said. 

Among those freed were also Alsu Kurmasheva, a dual U.S.-Russian citizen and journalist, and Vladimir Kara-Murza, a U.S. resident and prominent Russian opposition politician. 

During the press conference, a reporter asked Biden about Trump’s previous claims that he could have freed these hostages without making any concessions.

“Why didn’t he do it when he was president?” Biden replied.

Trump condemned the exchange, describing it as “extortion” on the country and warning that it establishes a “bad precedent for the future.”

He also urged the administration to disclose the details of the exchange.

“So when are they going to release the details of the prisoner swap with Russia? How many people do we get versus them? Are we also paying them cash? Are they giving us cash (Please withdraw that question, because I’m sure the answer is NO)? Are we releasing murderers, killers, or thugs?,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“Just curious because we never make good deals, at anything, but especially hostage swaps. Our “negotiators” are always an embarrassment to us! I got back many hostages, and gave the opposing Country NOTHING – and never any cash,” he wrote. 

“They’re calling the trade ‘complex’ – That’s so nobody can figure out how bad it is!” he added.

2024-08-01 21:01:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2F3108111%2Fvance-credits-prisoner-release-trumps-strength%2F?w=600&h=450, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) suggested Russia’s willingness to participate in the prisoner swap with the United States was influenced by their fear about a potential second Trump administration. “We certainly want these Americans to come back home. It was ridiculous that they were in prison to begin with,” Vance said in an interview with CNN.,

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) suggested Russia’s willingness to participate in the prisoner swap with the United States was influenced by their fear about a potential second Trump administration.

“We certainly want these Americans to come back home. It was ridiculous that they were in prison to begin with,” Vance said in an interview with CNN.

Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich and former Marine Paul Whelan are among the prisoners being released from Russian custody.

“We have to ask ourselves: Why are they coming home? And I think it’s because bad guys all over the world recognize Donald Trump’s about to be back in office, so they’re cleaning house,” Vance said. 

“That’s a good thing, and I think it’s a testament to Donald Trump’s strength.”

This swap marked the first such exchange since December 2022, when basketball player Brittney Griner was released in exchange for Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout.

According to the Turkish presidential office, more than two dozen prisoners were exchanged, including people from the U.S., Germany, Poland, Slovenia, Norway, Russia, and Belarus.

“This deal would not have been made possible without our allies. They stood with us,” President Joe Biden said during a White House briefing. 

“For anyone who questions whether allies matter, they do. They matter. Today is a powerful example why it’s vital to have friends in this world. Our alliances make our people safer,” Biden said. 

Among those freed were also Alsu Kurmasheva, a dual U.S.-Russian citizen and journalist, and Vladimir Kara-Murza, a U.S. resident and prominent Russian opposition politician. 

During the press conference, a reporter asked Biden about Trump’s previous claims that he could have freed these hostages without making any concessions.

“Why didn’t he do it when he was president?” Biden replied.

Trump condemned the exchange, describing it as “extortion” on the country and warning that it establishes a “bad precedent for the future.”

He also urged the administration to disclose the details of the exchange.

“So when are they going to release the details of the prisoner swap with Russia? How many people do we get versus them? Are we also paying them cash? Are they giving us cash (Please withdraw that question, because I’m sure the answer is NO)? Are we releasing murderers, killers, or thugs?,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“Just curious because we never make good deals, at anything, but especially hostage swaps. Our “negotiators” are always an embarrassment to us! I got back many hostages, and gave the opposing Country NOTHING – and never any cash,” he wrote. 

“They’re calling the trade ‘complex’ – That’s so nobody can figure out how bad it is!” he added.

, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) suggested Russia’s willingness to participate in the prisoner swap with the United States was influenced by their fear about a potential second Trump administration. “We certainly want these Americans to come back home. It was ridiculous that they were in prison to begin with,” Vance said in an interview with CNN. Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich and former Marine Paul Whelan are among the prisoners being released from Russian custody. “We have to ask ourselves: Why are they coming home? And I think it’s because bad guys all over the world recognize Donald Trump’s about to be back in office, so they’re cleaning house,” Vance said.  “That’s a good thing, and I think it’s a testament to Donald Trump’s strength.” This swap marked the first such exchange since December 2022, when basketball player Brittney Griner was released in exchange for Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout. According to the Turkish presidential office, more than two dozen prisoners were exchanged, including people from the U.S., Germany, Poland, Slovenia, Norway, Russia, and Belarus. “This deal would not have been made possible without our allies. They stood with us,” President Joe Biden said during a White House briefing.  President Joe Biden, right, reaches out to hold hands with Elizabeth Whelan, left, as he delivers remarks on a prisoner swap with Russia from the State Dining Room of the White House, Thursday, Aug. 1, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) “For anyone who questions whether allies matter, they do. They matter. Today is a powerful example why it’s vital to have friends in this world. Our alliances make our people safer,” Biden said.  Among those freed were also Alsu Kurmasheva, a dual U.S.-Russian citizen and journalist, and Vladimir Kara-Murza, a U.S. resident and prominent Russian opposition politician.  During the press conference, a reporter asked Biden about Trump’s previous claims that he could have freed these hostages without making any concessions. “Why didn’t he do it when he was president?” Biden replied. Trump condemned the exchange, describing it as “extortion” on the country and warning that it establishes a “bad precedent for the future.” He also urged the administration to disclose the details of the exchange. “So when are they going to release the details of the prisoner swap with Russia? How many people do we get versus them? Are we also paying them cash? Are they giving us cash (Please withdraw that question, because I’m sure the answer is NO)? Are we releasing murderers, killers, or thugs?,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER “Just curious because we never make good deals, at anything, but especially hostage swaps. Our “negotiators” are always an embarrassment to us! I got back many hostages, and gave the opposing Country NOTHING – and never any cash,” he wrote.  “They’re calling the trade ‘complex’ – That’s so nobody can figure out how bad it is!” he added., , , https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Vance_campaign_678.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Ailin Vilches Arguello,

Local Boards of Elections are urging people to sign up to work the polls for the election on Nov. 5.

Established in 2020 by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Aug. 1 is National Poll Worker Recruitment Day. 

This day is dedicated to encouraging people to sign up as poll workers and help ensure a smooth voting process.

In Washington, D.C., the Election Day staff work from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. and earn approximately $250 to $300.

Volunteers must be at least 16 years old and attend a four-hour training session, while supervisory workers are required to complete a full day of training.

To be eligible, poll workers must be residents of D.C., and supervisory workers must be both residents and registered voters.

Among other duties, workers are also expected to assist in preparing the precinct for two to three hours the day before the election.

“By encouraging more people to become poll workers in their communities, National Poll Worker Recruitment Day aims to address the critical shortage of poll workers, strengthen our democracy, inspire greater civic engagement and volunteerism, and help ensure free and fair elections in November and beyond,” their website says.   

In 2022, EAC also launched “Help America Vote” to support recruitment efforts for election officials. 

For more details on how to become an election poll worker, click here.

According to a 2022 Election Administration and Voting Survey, more than half of election officials find recruiting poll workers challenging, while nearly a quarter find it somewhat or very easy.

The data also showed that the average poll worker is 61 or older, with a decrease in younger age groups from 2020 to 2022.

In this same period, in-person voting increased from 30.5% to 49%.

While specific responsibilities and wages vary by jurisdiction, poll workers are typically assigned to set up and arrange the polling place, assist voters, confirm voter registrations, and distribute ballots.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

They also support voters by assisting with voting equipment and explaining voting procedures.

If interested, people should check if they need to be a registered voter, meet age or residency requirements, or have a political party affiliation.

2024-08-01 15:29:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2F3107236%2Flocal-boards-call-for-poll-worker-sign-ups-on-election-day%2F?w=600&h=450, Local Boards of Elections are urging people to sign up to work the polls for the election on Nov. 5. Established in 2020 by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Aug. 1 is National Poll Worker Recruitment Day.  This day is dedicated to encouraging people to sign up as poll workers and help ensure a smooth,

Local Boards of Elections are urging people to sign up to work the polls for the election on Nov. 5.

Established in 2020 by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Aug. 1 is National Poll Worker Recruitment Day. 

This day is dedicated to encouraging people to sign up as poll workers and help ensure a smooth voting process.

In Washington, D.C., the Election Day staff work from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. and earn approximately $250 to $300.

Volunteers must be at least 16 years old and attend a four-hour training session, while supervisory workers are required to complete a full day of training.

To be eligible, poll workers must be residents of D.C., and supervisory workers must be both residents and registered voters.

Among other duties, workers are also expected to assist in preparing the precinct for two to three hours the day before the election.

“By encouraging more people to become poll workers in their communities, National Poll Worker Recruitment Day aims to address the critical shortage of poll workers, strengthen our democracy, inspire greater civic engagement and volunteerism, and help ensure free and fair elections in November and beyond,” their website says.   

In 2022, EAC also launched “Help America Vote” to support recruitment efforts for election officials. 

For more details on how to become an election poll worker, click here.

According to a 2022 Election Administration and Voting Survey, more than half of election officials find recruiting poll workers challenging, while nearly a quarter find it somewhat or very easy.

The data also showed that the average poll worker is 61 or older, with a decrease in younger age groups from 2020 to 2022.

In this same period, in-person voting increased from 30.5% to 49%.

While specific responsibilities and wages vary by jurisdiction, poll workers are typically assigned to set up and arrange the polling place, assist voters, confirm voter registrations, and distribute ballots.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

They also support voters by assisting with voting equipment and explaining voting procedures.

If interested, people should check if they need to be a registered voter, meet age or residency requirements, or have a political party affiliation.

, Local Boards of Elections are urging people to sign up to work the polls for the election on Nov. 5. Established in 2020 by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Aug. 1 is National Poll Worker Recruitment Day.  This day is dedicated to encouraging people to sign up as poll workers and help ensure a smooth voting process. In Washington, D.C., the Election Day staff work from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. and earn approximately $250 to $300. Volunteers must be at least 16 years old and attend a four-hour training session, while supervisory workers are required to complete a full day of training. To be eligible, poll workers must be residents of D.C., and supervisory workers must be both residents and registered voters. Among other duties, workers are also expected to assist in preparing the precinct for two to three hours the day before the election. “By encouraging more people to become poll workers in their communities, National Poll Worker Recruitment Day aims to address the critical shortage of poll workers, strengthen our democracy, inspire greater civic engagement and volunteerism, and help ensure free and fair elections in November and beyond,” their website says.    In 2022, EAC also launched “Help America Vote” to support recruitment efforts for election officials.  For more details on how to become an election poll worker, click here. According to a 2022 Election Administration and Voting Survey, more than half of election officials find recruiting poll workers challenging, while nearly a quarter find it somewhat or very easy. The data also showed that the average poll worker is 61 or older, with a decrease in younger age groups from 2020 to 2022. In this same period, in-person voting increased from 30.5% to 49%. While specific responsibilities and wages vary by jurisdiction, poll workers are typically assigned to set up and arrange the polling place, assist voters, confirm voter registrations, and distribute ballots. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER They also support voters by assisting with voting equipment and explaining voting procedures. If interested, people should check if they need to be a registered voter, meet age or residency requirements, or have a political party affiliation., , , https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Biden_Harris_Democrats_Voters_DNC_elections_55.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Ailin Vilches Arguello,

The United States launched a strike on Iranian-backed forces in Iraq, marking its first operation in the country since February.

According to Iraqi officials, U.S. fighter jets struck several Iranian-aligned militia groups in Babil province, south of Baghdad, on Tuesday. 

The strike killed four members of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), which includes several Iran-backed armed militias, and injured four others.

PMF denounced the attack and called on Iraq to “unite efforts to make an immediate decision for the expulsion of foreign forces from our country.”

U.S. officials told Reuters that American forces carried out this attack in response to a drone threat that posed a risk to U.S. and coalition forces from these militias.

Yehia Rasool, a spokesman for Iraq’s armed forces commander, condemned the strike as a “reckless and irresponsible aggressive act.”

“Such serious and uncalculated transgressions can significantly undermine all efforts, mechanisms, and frameworks of joint security work to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria,” Rasool said in a post on X.

“They also risk dragging Iraq and the entire region into dangerous conflicts and wars. Therefore, we hold the coalition forces fully responsible for these consequences following this flagrant aggression.”

Last week, Iranian-backed militias targeted U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria for the first time since early February.  

Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder confirmed these two attacks were unsuccessful and caused no injuries. 

“We certainly condemn the attack by an Iran-aligned militia group against U.S. forces in Syria,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said after last week’s attack.

“We’ve seen these attacks, obviously, in the past. We have made quite clear to Iran, we’ve made quite clear to Iran’s proxy groups that we will defend our interests, we will defend our personnel, and that continues to be the case.”

Since Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack in Israel, these Iranian-aligned militias have targeted U.S. troops at least 170 times.

In January, militias killed three U.S. troops at a small base in Jordan, prompting the United States to respond with a strike in February.

Moreover, the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen have persistently attacked ships in the Red Sea.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

According to Reuters, Iraqi officials are seeking the withdrawal of the roughly 2,500 U.S. troops fighting terrorism by September and aim to end the coalition by next year.

This latest U.S. strike coincided with Israel killing top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut and another strike in Iran that killed top Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.

2024-07-31 20:25:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fworld%2F3106487%2Fus-launches-strike-on-iran-backed-forces-in-iraq%2F?w=600&h=450, The United States launched a strike on Iranian-backed forces in Iraq, marking its first operation in the country since February. According to Iraqi officials, U.S. fighter jets struck several Iranian-aligned militia groups in Babil province, south of Baghdad, on Tuesday.  The strike killed four members of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), which includes several Iran-backed,

The United States launched a strike on Iranian-backed forces in Iraq, marking its first operation in the country since February.

According to Iraqi officials, U.S. fighter jets struck several Iranian-aligned militia groups in Babil province, south of Baghdad, on Tuesday. 

The strike killed four members of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), which includes several Iran-backed armed militias, and injured four others.

PMF denounced the attack and called on Iraq to “unite efforts to make an immediate decision for the expulsion of foreign forces from our country.”

U.S. officials told Reuters that American forces carried out this attack in response to a drone threat that posed a risk to U.S. and coalition forces from these militias.

Yehia Rasool, a spokesman for Iraq’s armed forces commander, condemned the strike as a “reckless and irresponsible aggressive act.”

“Such serious and uncalculated transgressions can significantly undermine all efforts, mechanisms, and frameworks of joint security work to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria,” Rasool said in a post on X.

“They also risk dragging Iraq and the entire region into dangerous conflicts and wars. Therefore, we hold the coalition forces fully responsible for these consequences following this flagrant aggression.”

Last week, Iranian-backed militias targeted U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria for the first time since early February.  

Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder confirmed these two attacks were unsuccessful and caused no injuries. 

“We certainly condemn the attack by an Iran-aligned militia group against U.S. forces in Syria,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said after last week’s attack.

“We’ve seen these attacks, obviously, in the past. We have made quite clear to Iran, we’ve made quite clear to Iran’s proxy groups that we will defend our interests, we will defend our personnel, and that continues to be the case.”

Since Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack in Israel, these Iranian-aligned militias have targeted U.S. troops at least 170 times.

In January, militias killed three U.S. troops at a small base in Jordan, prompting the United States to respond with a strike in February.

Moreover, the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen have persistently attacked ships in the Red Sea.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

According to Reuters, Iraqi officials are seeking the withdrawal of the roughly 2,500 U.S. troops fighting terrorism by September and aim to end the coalition by next year.

This latest U.S. strike coincided with Israel killing top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut and another strike in Iran that killed top Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.

, The United States launched a strike on Iranian-backed forces in Iraq, marking its first operation in the country since February. According to Iraqi officials, U.S. fighter jets struck several Iranian-aligned militia groups in Babil province, south of Baghdad, on Tuesday.  The strike killed four members of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), which includes several Iran-backed armed militias, and injured four others. PMF denounced the attack and called on Iraq to “unite efforts to make an immediate decision for the expulsion of foreign forces from our country.” U.S. officials told Reuters that American forces carried out this attack in response to a drone threat that posed a risk to U.S. and coalition forces from these militias. Yehia Rasool, a spokesman for Iraq’s armed forces commander, condemned the strike as a “reckless and irresponsible aggressive act.” “Such serious and uncalculated transgressions can significantly undermine all efforts, mechanisms, and frameworks of joint security work to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria,” Rasool said in a post on X. “They also risk dragging Iraq and the entire region into dangerous conflicts and wars. Therefore, we hold the coalition forces fully responsible for these consequences following this flagrant aggression.” Despite extensive efforts through political and diplomatic channels, as well as the efforts of the higher military commission, which have reached advanced stages in the efforts of ending the presence and operations of the Global Coalition against Daesh in Iraq and transitioning… https://t.co/mKteduOdjw — المكتب الإعلامي لرئيس الوزراء (@IraqiPMO) July 31, 2024 Last week, Iranian-backed militias targeted U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria for the first time since early February.   Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder confirmed these two attacks were unsuccessful and caused no injuries.  “We certainly condemn the attack by an Iran-aligned militia group against U.S. forces in Syria,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said after last week’s attack. “We’ve seen these attacks, obviously, in the past. We have made quite clear to Iran, we’ve made quite clear to Iran’s proxy groups that we will defend our interests, we will defend our personnel, and that continues to be the case.” Since Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack in Israel, these Iranian-aligned militias have targeted U.S. troops at least 170 times. In January, militias killed three U.S. troops at a small base in Jordan, prompting the United States to respond with a strike in February. Moreover, the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen have persistently attacked ships in the Red Sea. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER According to Reuters, Iraqi officials are seeking the withdrawal of the roughly 2,500 U.S. troops fighting terrorism by September and aim to end the coalition by next year. This latest U.S. strike coincided with Israel killing top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut and another strike in Iran that killed top Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh., , , https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/defense-department-education-dei-2024-scaled-1024×543.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Ailin Vilches Arguello,

A New York judge barred Wayne LaPierre from returning to lead the National Rifle Association.

State Supreme Court Judge Joel Cohen issued a 10-year ban following a jury’s verdict that found the NRA and its executives guilty in a civil corruption trial.

However, he rejected New York Attorney General Letitia James’s proposal to appoint an independent monitor to oversee the organization’s finances and report to the court for three years.

James was also looking to impose a permanent ban on LaPierre returning to lead the NRA or its affiliates rather than a 10-year restriction.

In February, a Manhattan state court jury concluded the trial’s first phase, finding LaPierre misused millions of NRA funds and ordering him to repay nearly $4.4 million to the organization.

At the beginning of this month, former NRA finance chief Wilson Phillips agreed to a 10-year ban from managing nonprofit funds in New York.

Phillips was accused of concealing and facilitating LaPierre’s personal expenses, including private jet flights and other luxuries for him and his wife. 

He remains liable for $2 million in damages to the NRA for his role in these activities.

“The damages portion of the case we presented, as well as the earlier trial before the jury, demonstrated that the NRA had a stunning lack of accountability and its leaders engaged in illegality and self-dealing,” James said in a statement. 

“After years of corruption, the NRA and its senior leaders are finally being held accountable,” she said.

Before the trial began in January, LaPierre announced his resignation, citing health problems, after serving as the NRA’s CEO and executive vice president for over 30 years.

However, jurors found grounds for LaPierre’s removal from the NRA, determining he had breached his duty to act in good faith. 

They reached the same conclusion about John Frazer, the group’s corporate secretary and former general counsel.

LaPierre was found liable for $5.4 million in monetary harm to the NRA, although he has already repaid at least $1 million of that amount.

Frazer was not found to have caused any monetary harm to the group, and Cohen did not impose any restrictions on him.

LaPierre’s attorney, P. Kent Correll, argued against the 10-year ban on his client.

Correll said LaPierre was retired and “not coming back” to the NRA. 

However, he said his client wants to “keep his right to associate freely with whomever he wants and to speak freely.”

The NRA opposed the attorney general’s independent monitor proposal, arguing that James could not prove any legal violations and claiming that it had addressed past problems by hiring new leadership.

For instance, the organization replaced Frazer as general counsel in May. Yet, he was later reelected to serve as corporate secretary.

As a nonprofit charitable corporation, the NRA is required by law to use its assets to benefit its members and advance its mission.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

In the last few years, NRA membership dues and contributions have sharply declined.

According to court documents, dues dropped from about $170 million in 2018 to nearly $62 million in 2023, and contributions were nearly cut in half during that period.

2024-07-30 19:40:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2F3104689%2Fjudge-temporarily-bars-lapierre-from-nra-leadership%2F?w=600&h=450, A New York judge barred Wayne LaPierre from returning to lead the National Rifle Association. State Supreme Court Judge Joel Cohen issued a 10-year ban following a jury’s verdict that found the NRA and its executives guilty in a civil corruption trial. However, he rejected New York Attorney General Letitia James’s proposal to appoint an,

A New York judge barred Wayne LaPierre from returning to lead the National Rifle Association.

State Supreme Court Judge Joel Cohen issued a 10-year ban following a jury’s verdict that found the NRA and its executives guilty in a civil corruption trial.

However, he rejected New York Attorney General Letitia James’s proposal to appoint an independent monitor to oversee the organization’s finances and report to the court for three years.

James was also looking to impose a permanent ban on LaPierre returning to lead the NRA or its affiliates rather than a 10-year restriction.

In February, a Manhattan state court jury concluded the trial’s first phase, finding LaPierre misused millions of NRA funds and ordering him to repay nearly $4.4 million to the organization.

At the beginning of this month, former NRA finance chief Wilson Phillips agreed to a 10-year ban from managing nonprofit funds in New York.

Phillips was accused of concealing and facilitating LaPierre’s personal expenses, including private jet flights and other luxuries for him and his wife. 

He remains liable for $2 million in damages to the NRA for his role in these activities.

“The damages portion of the case we presented, as well as the earlier trial before the jury, demonstrated that the NRA had a stunning lack of accountability and its leaders engaged in illegality and self-dealing,” James said in a statement. 

“After years of corruption, the NRA and its senior leaders are finally being held accountable,” she said.

Before the trial began in January, LaPierre announced his resignation, citing health problems, after serving as the NRA’s CEO and executive vice president for over 30 years.

However, jurors found grounds for LaPierre’s removal from the NRA, determining he had breached his duty to act in good faith. 

They reached the same conclusion about John Frazer, the group’s corporate secretary and former general counsel.

LaPierre was found liable for $5.4 million in monetary harm to the NRA, although he has already repaid at least $1 million of that amount.

Frazer was not found to have caused any monetary harm to the group, and Cohen did not impose any restrictions on him.

LaPierre’s attorney, P. Kent Correll, argued against the 10-year ban on his client.

Correll said LaPierre was retired and “not coming back” to the NRA. 

However, he said his client wants to “keep his right to associate freely with whomever he wants and to speak freely.”

The NRA opposed the attorney general’s independent monitor proposal, arguing that James could not prove any legal violations and claiming that it had addressed past problems by hiring new leadership.

For instance, the organization replaced Frazer as general counsel in May. Yet, he was later reelected to serve as corporate secretary.

As a nonprofit charitable corporation, the NRA is required by law to use its assets to benefit its members and advance its mission.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

In the last few years, NRA membership dues and contributions have sharply declined.

According to court documents, dues dropped from about $170 million in 2018 to nearly $62 million in 2023, and contributions were nearly cut in half during that period.

, A New York judge barred Wayne LaPierre from returning to lead the National Rifle Association. State Supreme Court Judge Joel Cohen issued a 10-year ban following a jury’s verdict that found the NRA and its executives guilty in a civil corruption trial. However, he rejected New York Attorney General Letitia James’s proposal to appoint an independent monitor to oversee the organization’s finances and report to the court for three years. James was also looking to impose a permanent ban on LaPierre returning to lead the NRA or its affiliates rather than a 10-year restriction. In February, a Manhattan state court jury concluded the trial’s first phase, finding LaPierre misused millions of NRA funds and ordering him to repay nearly $4.4 million to the organization. At the beginning of this month, former NRA finance chief Wilson Phillips agreed to a 10-year ban from managing nonprofit funds in New York. Wayne LaPierre, former CEO of the National Rifle Association, leaves a courthouse in New York on Monday, July 29, 2024. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) Phillips was accused of concealing and facilitating LaPierre’s personal expenses, including private jet flights and other luxuries for him and his wife.  He remains liable for $2 million in damages to the NRA for his role in these activities. “The damages portion of the case we presented, as well as the earlier trial before the jury, demonstrated that the NRA had a stunning lack of accountability and its leaders engaged in illegality and self-dealing,” James said in a statement.  “After years of corruption, the NRA and its senior leaders are finally being held accountable,” she said. Before the trial began in January, LaPierre announced his resignation, citing health problems, after serving as the NRA’s CEO and executive vice president for over 30 years. However, jurors found grounds for LaPierre’s removal from the NRA, determining he had breached his duty to act in good faith.  Wayne LaPierre, former CEO of the National Rifle Association, walks in the hallway at civil court in New York, Monday, July 15, 2024. (AP Photo/Stefan Jeremiah) They reached the same conclusion about John Frazer, the group’s corporate secretary and former general counsel. LaPierre was found liable for $5.4 million in monetary harm to the NRA, although he has already repaid at least $1 million of that amount. Frazer was not found to have caused any monetary harm to the group, and Cohen did not impose any restrictions on him. LaPierre’s attorney, P. Kent Correll, argued against the 10-year ban on his client. Correll said LaPierre was retired and “not coming back” to the NRA.  However, he said his client wants to “keep his right to associate freely with whomever he wants and to speak freely.” NRA general counsel John Frazer arrives at court in New York on Jan. 8, 2024. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) The NRA opposed the attorney general’s independent monitor proposal, arguing that James could not prove any legal violations and claiming that it had addressed past problems by hiring new leadership. For instance, the organization replaced Frazer as general counsel in May. Yet, he was later reelected to serve as corporate secretary. As a nonprofit charitable corporation, the NRA is required by law to use its assets to benefit its members and advance its mission. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER In the last few years, NRA membership dues and contributions have sharply declined. According to court documents, dues dropped from about $170 million in 2018 to nearly $62 million in 2023, and contributions were nearly cut in half during that period., , , https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/wayne-lapierre.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Ailin Vilches Arguello,

Transit and environmental groups sued Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) for blocking a plan to reduce traffic and fund the subway system with a new toll on Manhattan drivers.

The groups argue that Hochul’s decision to indefinitely suspend this measure violated state laws and the state constitution.

The program, which was scheduled to start on June 30, would have charged drivers entering central Manhattan a toll of around $15, with prices varying on the vehicle type.

This fee was expected to generate approximately $1 billion annually for transit improvements in New York.

In their lawsuit, the Riders Alliance, the Sierra Club, and the New York City Environmental Justice Alliance argued that Hochul’s decision violated New Yorkers’ right to “clean air and water, and a healthful environment.”

“The people of New York City deserve to breathe,” the lawsuit states.

In a separate lawsuit, the City Club of New York argued that only the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority has the power to implement congestion pricing and the governor has no role in the decision.

Following years of public debate, state lawmakers approved this plan in 2019, which was later signed into law by former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“As powerful as a governor is, this Governor has no legal authority — none — to ‘direct’ the Metropolitan Transportation Authority” (MTA) to pause congestion pricing,” the lawsuit reads. 

However, Hochul’s office dismissed the lawsuits as a political maneuver.

“Get in line. There are now 11 separate congestion pricing lawsuits filed by groups trying to weaponize the judicial system to score political points, but Governor Hochul remains focused on what matters: funding transit, reducing congestion, and protecting working New Yorkers,” spokeswoman Maggie Halley told the Associated Press.

Some groups trying to block this program include a public teachers union, New Jersey residents, and local truckers, who filed suits ahead of the expected start date.

Hochul has defended her decision based on economic concerns and public input, while also proposing raising business taxes to cover the lost transit revenue. However, lawmakers rejected this proposal.

City Comptroller Brad Lander warned that if the governor’s decision is upheld, New Yorkers will experience “increasing service cuts, gridlock, air quality alerts, and inaccessible stations.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Betsy Plum, executive director of the Riders Alliance, said this plan would benefit New Yorkers by generating revenue to make public transportation “faster, more reliable and accessible,” while also reducing “costly gridlock, carbon emissions, deadly collisions and toxic air pollution.”

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority had already installed cameras, sensors, and license plate readers for the program, as well as secured a $500 million contract with a private vendor to manage the tolling infrastructure.

2024-07-25 21:36:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fstate%2F3099882%2Fhochul-sued-by-transit-environmental-groups-manhattan-congestion-toll-delay%2F?w=600&h=450, Transit and environmental groups sued Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) for blocking a plan to reduce traffic and fund the subway system with a new toll on Manhattan drivers. The groups argue that Hochul’s decision to indefinitely suspend this measure violated state laws and the state constitution. The program, which was scheduled to start on June,

Transit and environmental groups sued Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) for blocking a plan to reduce traffic and fund the subway system with a new toll on Manhattan drivers.

The groups argue that Hochul’s decision to indefinitely suspend this measure violated state laws and the state constitution.

The program, which was scheduled to start on June 30, would have charged drivers entering central Manhattan a toll of around $15, with prices varying on the vehicle type.

This fee was expected to generate approximately $1 billion annually for transit improvements in New York.

In their lawsuit, the Riders Alliance, the Sierra Club, and the New York City Environmental Justice Alliance argued that Hochul’s decision violated New Yorkers’ right to “clean air and water, and a healthful environment.”

“The people of New York City deserve to breathe,” the lawsuit states.

In a separate lawsuit, the City Club of New York argued that only the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority has the power to implement congestion pricing and the governor has no role in the decision.

Following years of public debate, state lawmakers approved this plan in 2019, which was later signed into law by former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“As powerful as a governor is, this Governor has no legal authority — none — to ‘direct’ the Metropolitan Transportation Authority” (MTA) to pause congestion pricing,” the lawsuit reads. 

However, Hochul’s office dismissed the lawsuits as a political maneuver.

“Get in line. There are now 11 separate congestion pricing lawsuits filed by groups trying to weaponize the judicial system to score political points, but Governor Hochul remains focused on what matters: funding transit, reducing congestion, and protecting working New Yorkers,” spokeswoman Maggie Halley told the Associated Press.

Some groups trying to block this program include a public teachers union, New Jersey residents, and local truckers, who filed suits ahead of the expected start date.

Hochul has defended her decision based on economic concerns and public input, while also proposing raising business taxes to cover the lost transit revenue. However, lawmakers rejected this proposal.

City Comptroller Brad Lander warned that if the governor’s decision is upheld, New Yorkers will experience “increasing service cuts, gridlock, air quality alerts, and inaccessible stations.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Betsy Plum, executive director of the Riders Alliance, said this plan would benefit New Yorkers by generating revenue to make public transportation “faster, more reliable and accessible,” while also reducing “costly gridlock, carbon emissions, deadly collisions and toxic air pollution.”

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority had already installed cameras, sensors, and license plate readers for the program, as well as secured a $500 million contract with a private vendor to manage the tolling infrastructure.

, Transit and environmental groups sued Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) for blocking a plan to reduce traffic and fund the subway system with a new toll on Manhattan drivers. The groups argue that Hochul’s decision to indefinitely suspend this measure violated state laws and the state constitution. The program, which was scheduled to start on June 30, would have charged drivers entering central Manhattan a toll of around $15, with prices varying on the vehicle type. This fee was expected to generate approximately $1 billion annually for transit improvements in New York. Traffic enters lower Manhattan after crossing the Brooklyn Bridge, Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews, File) In their lawsuit, the Riders Alliance, the Sierra Club, and the New York City Environmental Justice Alliance argued that Hochul’s decision violated New Yorkers’ right to “clean air and water, and a healthful environment.” “The people of New York City deserve to breathe,” the lawsuit states. In a separate lawsuit, the City Club of New York argued that only the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority has the power to implement congestion pricing and the governor has no role in the decision. Following years of public debate, state lawmakers approved this plan in 2019, which was later signed into law by former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo. “As powerful as a governor is, this Governor has no legal authority — none — to ‘direct’ the Metropolitan Transportation Authority” (MTA) to pause congestion pricing,” the lawsuit reads.  Protesters demonstrate outside Gov. Kathy Hochul’s (D-NY) Manhattan office, Wednesday, June 5, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura) However, Hochul’s office dismissed the lawsuits as a political maneuver. “Get in line. There are now 11 separate congestion pricing lawsuits filed by groups trying to weaponize the judicial system to score political points, but Governor Hochul remains focused on what matters: funding transit, reducing congestion, and protecting working New Yorkers,” spokeswoman Maggie Halley told the Associated Press. Some groups trying to block this program include a public teachers union, New Jersey residents, and local truckers, who filed suits ahead of the expected start date. Hochul has defended her decision based on economic concerns and public input, while also proposing raising business taxes to cover the lost transit revenue. However, lawmakers rejected this proposal. City Comptroller Brad Lander warned that if the governor’s decision is upheld, New Yorkers will experience “increasing service cuts, gridlock, air quality alerts, and inaccessible stations.” CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER Betsy Plum, executive director of the Riders Alliance, said this plan would benefit New Yorkers by generating revenue to make public transportation “faster, more reliable and accessible,” while also reducing “costly gridlock, carbon emissions, deadly collisions and toxic air pollution.” The Metropolitan Transportation Authority had already installed cameras, sensors, and license plate readers for the program, as well as secured a $500 million contract with a private vendor to manage the tolling infrastructure., , , https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/hochulmtapricing.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Ailin Vilches Arguello,

At the Republican National Convention, guns are one item that will be allowed inside the “soft perimeter” surrounding the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, where delegates and officials are congregating.

Gov. Tony Evers (D-WI) tried to ask law enforcement to keep guns out of the zone, but his request was shot down because Wisconsin state laws allow individuals to carry firearms openly and conceal-carry with a permit within the “soft perimeter,” which surrounds the inner “hard perimeter” patrolled by the Secret Service.

After the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania, the situation is facing increased scrutiny, and security protocols are being reevaluated. But while guns are still on the list of items allowed, law enforcement officials have banned several other items inside the “soft perimeter,” including tennis balls, ladders, and paintball guns.

Yet, it excludes most firearms and only bans weapons that are already prohibited by state law, such as machine guns, silencers, fully automatic weapons, and short-barreled shotguns. 

Secret Service spokeswoman Alexi Worley said prohibiting guns in the broader security “footprint” is beyond the federal agency’s jurisdiction and “not something the U.S. Secret Service has any control over.”

“[It’s] utterly ridiculous,” Robert Bauman, a Milwaukee City alderman who proposed adding guns to the city ordinance, told ABC News. 

“I mean, I could just picture this image of somebody coming up to the entry point with, you know, an AR-15 strapped over one shoulder, a long rifle over another, and two pistols in his belt, and the cops asking him, ‘You got any tennis balls?’”

State laws prevent local governments from imposing firearm regulations that exceed state guidelines.

“We as a city cannot legislate out of that,” Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman said at an RNC security press conference Sunday.

“Unless there’s something that is against state law, we have to respect Second Amendment rights, especially in regards to open-carry and conceal-carry if you’re licensed,” he added.

According to ABC News, the FBI special agent in charge of the agency’s Wisconsin field office mentioned an anticipated increase in threats seen online.

After stating that no changes would be made to the security plan, Secret Service officials announced Monday morning they had reviewed and reinforced the security measures for the RNC.

“This event is designated as a national special security event, which is the highest level of security for an event that can be designated by the government. So, this is a whole of government approach. We’ve had an extensive planning process to include many organizations,” Audrey Gibson-Cicchino, the Secret Service’s RNC coordinator, said.

Gibson-Cicchino also confirmed there were no intentions to expand the convention perimeter and indicated she was unaware of any request from Evers to prohibit guns in the outer perimeter, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Below is the full list of items that have been banned within all public areas of the security footprint:

• Lumber larger than 2 inches in width and 0.25 inches thick, including supports for signs
• Metal, plastic, or other hard material more than 0.75 inches thick and 0.0125 inches in wall thickness, including pipes and tubing
• Air rifles, air pistols, paintball guns, blasting caps, cestus or other combat gloves, billy clubs, blackjacks, swords, sabers, hatchets, axes, slingshots, BB guns, pellet guns, wrist shots, wrist rockets, metal knuckles, nunchucks, iron buckles, ax handles, shovels or other things that could be used to hurt people or damage property
• Explosives, explosive devices, or incendiary devices
• Fireworks or rockets
• Drones or other unmanned aircraft systems and devices
• Containers of bodily fluid or waste
• Containers of flammable liquid
• Aerosol cans
• Mace, pepper spray, OC spray, or other chemical irritants
• Umbrellas with a metal tip
• Projectile launchers, including slingshots, water guns, or water cannons
• Adhesive, rope, chain, cable, strapping, wire, string, line, tape, or similar materials longer than 6 inches
• Glass bottles, ornaments, light bulbs, ceramic vessels, or other fragile or brittle containers, whether or not the container holds any substance
• Locks, without limitation, including padlocks, bicycle locks, chain locks, or similar devices
• Tents or other shelters, sleeping bags, sleeping pads, mattresses, cots, hammocks, bivy sacks, or stoves
• Coolers or ice chests
• Backpacks or bags bigger than 18 inches by 13 inches by 7 inches
• Lasers
• Non-plastic containers, bottles, cans, or thermoses
• Ladders
• Grappling hooks, sledgehammers, hammers, crowbars, or pry bars
• Canned goods
• Tennis balls or other similarly sized balls
• Gas masks or similar devices used to protect against irritating or noxious gasses (This does not include medical oxygen or cloth masks, and N95 or KN95 surgical masks used as PPE to avoid transmission of viruses. Law enforcement and emergency responders acting in their official capacities are exempt.)

The bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission unanimously approved a set of guidelines to ensure the security of unstaffed absentee ballot drop boxes.

The news follows a recent ruling by the state Supreme Court that allows drop boxes to be widely used for the 2024 elections without being limited to specific locations.

This year, Wisconsin is expected to be one of the few swing states.

Since former President Donald Trump lost the state to President Joe Biden by just under 21,000 votes in 2020, the use of drop boxes has become a partisan issue. However, in this election, Republicans have reversed their opposition to the practice, saying that, to be competitive, they must embrace all voting methods that are legal in a state, including mail-in and drop boxes.

The approved best practices, which will be distributed to the state’s 1,800 local election officials, outline methods to ensure drop boxes and their surroundings are safe, well-lit, and accessible to voters. However, these guidelines are not mandatory.

Even though these recommendations do not specify regular intervals, they encourage clerks to empty drop boxes before they become full.

In addition, clerks are encouraged to document when the drop box is emptied, who did it, and the number of ballots retrieved.

The guidelines also recommend that drop boxes be clearly labeled and that any damage be recorded and inspected to ensure the box remains safe for use.

Clerks should ensure that voters are informed about the locations of drop boxes and the deadline for the last ballot retrieval.

The elections commission chose not to implement an emergency rule with legal force, opting instead to issue guidelines following the court’s ruling allowing unstaffed drop boxes in all elections, including the Aug. 13 primary and Nov. 5 general election.

In 2022, the state Supreme Court, then controlled by conservatives, restricted the use of drop boxes to election clerk offices, prohibiting their placement at unstaffed locations.

After the court shifted to their control, Democrats challenged the ruling, which was overturned by the court last week.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Last month, Biden’s reelection team urged leading Republicans to drop litigation over mail-in voting, citing Trump’s recent endorsement of the method.

While Trump has previously expressed opposition to mail-in ballots, his 2024 campaign launched a new initiative, the “Swamp the Vote” campaign, to promote mail-in voting as a convenient option for people and boost participation among their supporters.

Meta announced it will remove hate speech targeting “Zionists” used to refer to Jews and Israelis with dehumanizing comparisons, calls for harm, or denials of existence.

In a press release, the company said they consulted with 145 stakeholders from civil society and academia globally, including political scientists, historians, legal scholars, civil rights groups, and human rights experts. 

“We do not allow content that attacks people on the basis of protected characteristics such as nationality, race, or religion, among others,” the announcement said. “We do allow people to criticize adherents of political affiliations and ideologies.” 

Meta acknowledges the lack of global consensus on what people mean when they use the term “Zionist,” which carries many meanings based on its origins and context.

They argued that while it refers to a political movement, it can also function as a proxy for Jewish or Israeli individuals, who are protected under hate speech policies.

Therefore, based on their research and on-platform investigation into its use as a proxy term in hateful attacks, Meta will remove content targeting “Zionists.”

Previously, under their hate speech policy, “Zionist” was treated as a proxy for Jewish or Israeli people in cases where Zionists were compared to rats or when the context clearly indicated it meant “Jew” or “Israeli.”

Now, they will also remove content attacking Zionists when it does not explicitly pertain to the political movement. 

Instead, content that uses antisemitic stereotypes, threatens harm through intimidation or violence, and includes claims of world domination or controlling the media, dehumanizing comparisons, calls for physical harm, denials of existence, or mocking related to health issues.

To address comparisons between Zionists and criminals, Meta has referred some cases to their independent Oversight Board. 

These cases involve criminal comparisons where protected characteristics are used as shorthand for governments, soldiers, or specific groups, which Meta considers to be primarily political rather than hateful. 

Users with repeat violations of this policy may face suspension or removal of their account.

Meta said they protect “voice and legitimate free expression in other content about Zionists.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Last February, during the policy discussions, 73 organizations sent a letter to Meta expressing concerns that the proposed expansion could inaccurately portray discussions about Zionists and Zionism as inherently antisemitic, and could lead to the “harmful conflation of criticism of the acts of the state of Israel with antisemitism.”

“This move will prohibit Palestinians from sharing their daily experiences and histories with the world, be it a photo of the keys to their grandparent’s house lost when attacked by Zionist militias in 1948, or documentation and evidence of genocidal acts in Gaza over the past few months, authorized by the Israeli Cabinet, which includes members of the Religious Zionist Party,” the letter said. “And it would prevent Jewish users from discussing their relationships to Zionist political ideology.”

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) said she doesn’t like seeing her name mentioned as a possible replacement for President Joe Biden should he withdraw from the presidential campaign.

During a pre-launch interview with the Associated Press, Whitmer introduced her new memoir recounting national events from her career, including a clash with former President Donald Trump and a kidnapping plot targeting her family. 

In the interview, she tried to dispel recent speculation that she would step into the election if Biden were to step down.

“It’s a distraction more than anything,” she said. “I don’t like seeing my name in articles like that because I’m totally focused on governing and campaigning for the ticket.”

Since Biden’s poor debate performance last month, the governor has cropped up in several conversations about possible replacements for the president on the Democratic ticket.

In 2013, as Michigan’s Senate minority leader, Whitmer gained national attention when she abandoned her prepared remarks before a floor vote on an anti-abortion bill to share that she had been raped while in college.

She has been advocating abortion access as co-chair of the Biden campaign, asserting he supports the “right side” of the issue despite his performance in the recent debate on the question of reproductive rights.

“I think everyone has acknowledged it was not his finest 90 minutes,” she said. “That said, this is a man I’ve known for a long time and has decades of public service receipts that he’s delivered to people.”

The president has dismissed calls for him to step down, reiterating his commitment to staying in the race and proving his ability to voters.

Whitmer denied recent comments suggesting that Michigan was out of reach for Biden, attributing the spread of these remarks to a “potential future opponent’s staff person.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“Anyone who claims I would say that we can’t win Michigan is full of s***,” she posted on X last week.

In Michigan, the presidential race is tight, with Biden holding a 0.8-point lead on average over Trump in recent polls by the Hill/Decision Desk HQ.