Trump campaign hacked with documents sent to news outlets: What we know thumbnail

Trump campaign hacked with documents sent to news outlets: What we know

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign fell victim to foreign hackers, the campaign acknowledged after internal vetting documents were emailed to news outlets.

On Friday, Microsoft revealed that an Iranian group sent a spear phishing email to a high-ranking official on a presidential campaign. The email came from a compromised email account of a former senior adviser. At the time, it was not clear which campaign was involved, but over the weekend, Trump posted about the incursion on social media.

A 271-page vetting document about Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), was emailed to at least two news outlets, Politico and the Washington Post. The former outlet said that the document was “based on publicly available information about Vance’s past record and statements.”

The New Atlantis
Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump, shake hands at a campaign rally at Georgia State University in Atlanta, Saturday, Aug. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Ben Gray)

The hacked document was sent using an AOL email address by someone identifying themselves only as “Robert.”

“We were just informed by Microsoft Corporation that one of our many websites was hacked by the Iranian Government – Never a nice thing to do!” Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social. “They were only able to get publicly available information but, nevertheless, they shouldn’t be doing anything of this nature.”

“Iran and others will stop at nothing, because our Government is Weak and Ineffective, but it won’t be for long,” he continued. “What Iran doesn’t realize is that I will make the World a better and safer place, and that’s good for them, also!”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

In addition to the vetting document about Vance, there was also a document on Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who was a contender for Trump’s vice presidential pick before Vance was ultimately selected.

There has been concern that foreign actors such as Russia and Iran may try to use technology to meddle in the coming election, which features Trump facing off against Vice President Kamala Harris for the White House.

2024-08-11 20:45:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fpresidential%2F3117910%2Ftrump-campaign-hacked-documents-sent-news-outlets-what-we-know%2F?w=600&h=450, Former President Donald Trump’s campaign fell victim to foreign hackers, the campaign acknowledged after internal vetting documents were emailed to news outlets. On Friday, Microsoft revealed that an Iranian group sent a spear phishing email to a high-ranking official on a presidential campaign. The email came from a compromised email account of a former senior,

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign fell victim to foreign hackers, the campaign acknowledged after internal vetting documents were emailed to news outlets.

On Friday, Microsoft revealed that an Iranian group sent a spear phishing email to a high-ranking official on a presidential campaign. The email came from a compromised email account of a former senior adviser. At the time, it was not clear which campaign was involved, but over the weekend, Trump posted about the incursion on social media.

A 271-page vetting document about Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), was emailed to at least two news outlets, Politico and the Washington Post. The former outlet said that the document was “based on publicly available information about Vance’s past record and statements.”

The New Atlantis
Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump, shake hands at a campaign rally at Georgia State University in Atlanta, Saturday, Aug. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Ben Gray)

The hacked document was sent using an AOL email address by someone identifying themselves only as “Robert.”

“We were just informed by Microsoft Corporation that one of our many websites was hacked by the Iranian Government – Never a nice thing to do!” Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social. “They were only able to get publicly available information but, nevertheless, they shouldn’t be doing anything of this nature.”

“Iran and others will stop at nothing, because our Government is Weak and Ineffective, but it won’t be for long,” he continued. “What Iran doesn’t realize is that I will make the World a better and safer place, and that’s good for them, also!”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

In addition to the vetting document about Vance, there was also a document on Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who was a contender for Trump’s vice presidential pick before Vance was ultimately selected.

There has been concern that foreign actors such as Russia and Iran may try to use technology to meddle in the coming election, which features Trump facing off against Vice President Kamala Harris for the White House.

, Former President Donald Trump’s campaign fell victim to foreign hackers, the campaign acknowledged after internal vetting documents were emailed to news outlets. On Friday, Microsoft revealed that an Iranian group sent a spear phishing email to a high-ranking official on a presidential campaign. The email came from a compromised email account of a former senior adviser. At the time, it was not clear which campaign was involved, but over the weekend, Trump posted about the incursion on social media. A 271-page vetting document about Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), was emailed to at least two news outlets, Politico and the Washington Post. The former outlet said that the document was “based on publicly available information about Vance’s past record and statements.” Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump, shake hands at a campaign rally at Georgia State University in Atlanta, Saturday, Aug. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Ben Gray) The hacked document was sent using an AOL email address by someone identifying themselves only as “Robert.” “We were just informed by Microsoft Corporation that one of our many websites was hacked by the Iranian Government – Never a nice thing to do!” Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social. “They were only able to get publicly available information but, nevertheless, they shouldn’t be doing anything of this nature.” “Iran and others will stop at nothing, because our Government is Weak and Ineffective, but it won’t be for long,” he continued. “What Iran doesn’t realize is that I will make the World a better and safer place, and that’s good for them, also!” CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER In addition to the vetting document about Vance, there was also a document on Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who was a contender for Trump’s vice presidential pick before Vance was ultimately selected. There has been concern that foreign actors such as Russia and Iran may try to use technology to meddle in the coming election, which features Trump facing off against Vice President Kamala Harris for the White House., , Trump campaign hacked with documents sent to news outlets: What we know, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Trump-Vance.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Vance accuses Walz of lying about retirement from military for political gain thumbnail

Vance accuses Walz of lying about retirement from military for political gain

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) pushed back on Gov. Tim Walz’s service record, arguing that the Minnesota governor lied about his time in the military for political gain.

Vance was speaking to CNN’s State of the Union with host Dana Bash on Sunday morning when he made the remarks. Walz’s service has come under scrutiny by the Trump campaign and media, particularly about when and why Walz retired since he was tapped to be Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate.

“This is a guy who was captured on video saying, ‘I carried a gun in war.’ He never went to war,” said Vance, who also served in the military. “This is a guy who has been captured on video as other people say, ‘he‘s an Afghanistan veteran, he‘s a veteran of a war,’ nodding along in agreement instead of saying ‘no, no, no, I did serve my country and I did it honorably, but I never went to a war zone.’”

“I’m not criticizing Tim Walz’s service. I’m criticizing the fact that he lied about his service for political gain,” Vance added.

During the interview, Bash pointed out that Walz retired from the National Guard before it was announced that his unit would be deployed to Iraq.

But Vance pushed back on her and noted that Walz’s superior, former Minnesota National Guard Command Sgt. Maj. Doug Julin, went on CNN and said Walz may have known he was going to deploy before he used a “backdoor process” to get his retirement approved.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“We were informed that we would be alerted to go to Iraq within the next upcoming year, start preparing your team, getting your team together and let’s get the process in play,” Julin said.

The Washington Examiner reached out to Harris’s campaign for comment.

2024-08-11 20:07:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fpresidential%2F3117875%2Fvance-accuses-walz-of-lying-about-retirement-from-military-for-political-gain%2F?w=600&h=450, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) pushed back on Gov. Tim Walz’s service record, arguing that the Minnesota governor lied about his time in the military for political gain. Vance was speaking to CNN’s State of the Union with host Dana Bash on Sunday morning when he made the remarks. Walz’s service has come under scrutiny by,

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) pushed back on Gov. Tim Walz’s service record, arguing that the Minnesota governor lied about his time in the military for political gain.

Vance was speaking to CNN’s State of the Union with host Dana Bash on Sunday morning when he made the remarks. Walz’s service has come under scrutiny by the Trump campaign and media, particularly about when and why Walz retired since he was tapped to be Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate.

“This is a guy who was captured on video saying, ‘I carried a gun in war.’ He never went to war,” said Vance, who also served in the military. “This is a guy who has been captured on video as other people say, ‘he‘s an Afghanistan veteran, he‘s a veteran of a war,’ nodding along in agreement instead of saying ‘no, no, no, I did serve my country and I did it honorably, but I never went to a war zone.’”

“I’m not criticizing Tim Walz’s service. I’m criticizing the fact that he lied about his service for political gain,” Vance added.

During the interview, Bash pointed out that Walz retired from the National Guard before it was announced that his unit would be deployed to Iraq.

But Vance pushed back on her and noted that Walz’s superior, former Minnesota National Guard Command Sgt. Maj. Doug Julin, went on CNN and said Walz may have known he was going to deploy before he used a “backdoor process” to get his retirement approved.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“We were informed that we would be alerted to go to Iraq within the next upcoming year, start preparing your team, getting your team together and let’s get the process in play,” Julin said.

The Washington Examiner reached out to Harris’s campaign for comment.

, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) pushed back on Gov. Tim Walz’s service record, arguing that the Minnesota governor lied about his time in the military for political gain. Vance was speaking to CNN’s State of the Union with host Dana Bash on Sunday morning when he made the remarks. Walz’s service has come under scrutiny by the Trump campaign and media, particularly about when and why Walz retired since he was tapped to be Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate. “This is a guy who was captured on video saying, ‘I carried a gun in war.’ He never went to war,” said Vance, who also served in the military. “This is a guy who has been captured on video as other people say, ‘he‘s an Afghanistan veteran, he‘s a veteran of a war,’ nodding along in agreement instead of saying ‘no, no, no, I did serve my country and I did it honorably, but I never went to a war zone.’” “I’m not criticizing Tim Walz’s service. I’m criticizing the fact that he lied about his service for political gain,” Vance added. During the interview, Bash pointed out that Walz retired from the National Guard before it was announced that his unit would be deployed to Iraq. But Vance pushed back on her and noted that Walz’s superior, former Minnesota National Guard Command Sgt. Maj. Doug Julin, went on CNN and said Walz may have known he was going to deploy before he used a “backdoor process” to get his retirement approved. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER “We were informed that we would be alerted to go to Iraq within the next upcoming year, start preparing your team, getting your team together and let’s get the process in play,” Julin said. The Washington Examiner reached out to Harris’s campaign for comment., , Vance accuses Walz of lying about retirement from military for political gain, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/vance-walz-military.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Zelensky confirms Ukrainian troops fighting in Russia thumbnail

Zelensky confirms Ukrainian troops fighting in Russia

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has acknowledged that Ukrainian forces have moved into Russian territory days after news of the incursion first broke.

Zelensky, who assumed office in 2019 and has been the wartime leader of Ukraine since it was invaded by Russia, confirmed the counteroffensive during a Saturday address to the nation. Last week, Ukrainian forces entered Russia’s Kursk Oblast in a surprise for Moscow.

The 46-year-old leader said during a broadcast that Ukrainian forces are progressing in their effort “to push the war out into the aggressor’s territory.”

“Ukraine is proving that it really knows how to restore justice and guarantees exactly the kind of pressure that is needed — pressure on the aggressor,” Zelensky said.

Russia has responded to the counteroffensive into the Kursk region with antipathy, vowing that Russian troops will deliver a “tough response” to the attack. Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the “perpetrators of these crimes … will be held accountable for them,” according to CNN.

“A tough response from the Russian Armed Forces will not be long in coming,” she added. Zakharova said that in the past 24 hours, Ukraine launched “a large-scale drone attack” against several regions of Russia.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Russia launched attacks against nearly a dozen Ukrainian regions over the weekend and targeted Kyiv, the capital and largest city in Ukraine, according to the Kyiv Independent.

The Russian war against Ukraine began in February 2022 when Russian forces launched a mass invasion of Ukraine’s territory. Moscow faced global condemnation for the action, which has resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of troops and civilians.

2024-08-11 17:48:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fpolicy%2Fforeign-policy%2F3117830%2Fzelensky-confirms-ukrainian-troops-fighting-russia%2F?w=600&h=450, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has acknowledged that Ukrainian forces have moved into Russian territory days after news of the incursion first broke. Zelensky, who assumed office in 2019 and has been the wartime leader of Ukraine since it was invaded by Russia, confirmed the counteroffensive during a Saturday address to the nation. Last week, Ukrainian,

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has acknowledged that Ukrainian forces have moved into Russian territory days after news of the incursion first broke.

Zelensky, who assumed office in 2019 and has been the wartime leader of Ukraine since it was invaded by Russia, confirmed the counteroffensive during a Saturday address to the nation. Last week, Ukrainian forces entered Russia’s Kursk Oblast in a surprise for Moscow.

The 46-year-old leader said during a broadcast that Ukrainian forces are progressing in their effort “to push the war out into the aggressor’s territory.”

“Ukraine is proving that it really knows how to restore justice and guarantees exactly the kind of pressure that is needed — pressure on the aggressor,” Zelensky said.

Russia has responded to the counteroffensive into the Kursk region with antipathy, vowing that Russian troops will deliver a “tough response” to the attack. Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the “perpetrators of these crimes … will be held accountable for them,” according to CNN.

“A tough response from the Russian Armed Forces will not be long in coming,” she added. Zakharova said that in the past 24 hours, Ukraine launched “a large-scale drone attack” against several regions of Russia.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Russia launched attacks against nearly a dozen Ukrainian regions over the weekend and targeted Kyiv, the capital and largest city in Ukraine, according to the Kyiv Independent.

The Russian war against Ukraine began in February 2022 when Russian forces launched a mass invasion of Ukraine’s territory. Moscow faced global condemnation for the action, which has resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of troops and civilians.

, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has acknowledged that Ukrainian forces have moved into Russian territory days after news of the incursion first broke. Zelensky, who assumed office in 2019 and has been the wartime leader of Ukraine since it was invaded by Russia, confirmed the counteroffensive during a Saturday address to the nation. Last week, Ukrainian forces entered Russia’s Kursk Oblast in a surprise for Moscow. The 46-year-old leader said during a broadcast that Ukrainian forces are progressing in their effort “to push the war out into the aggressor’s territory.” “Ukraine is proving that it really knows how to restore justice and guarantees exactly the kind of pressure that is needed — pressure on the aggressor,” Zelensky said. Russia has responded to the counteroffensive into the Kursk region with antipathy, vowing that Russian troops will deliver a “tough response” to the attack. Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the “perpetrators of these crimes … will be held accountable for them,” according to CNN. “A tough response from the Russian Armed Forces will not be long in coming,” she added. Zakharova said that in the past 24 hours, Ukraine launched “a large-scale drone attack” against several regions of Russia. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER Russia launched attacks against nearly a dozen Ukrainian regions over the weekend and targeted Kyiv, the capital and largest city in Ukraine, according to the Kyiv Independent. The Russian war against Ukraine began in February 2022 when Russian forces launched a mass invasion of Ukraine’s territory. Moscow faced global condemnation for the action, which has resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of troops and civilians., , Zelensky confirms Ukrainian troops fighting in Russia, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zelensky-ukraine-russia.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Dave McCormick blasts Harris over past support for banning fracking thumbnail

Dave McCormick blasts Harris over past support for banning fracking

Republican Senate contender Dave McCormick, who is running against Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), attacked Vice President Kamala Harris for changing her position on fracking after becoming the Democratic presidential nominee.

Harris, who President Joe Biden endorsed after bowing out of the race last month, has reversed course on a number of issues since launching her campaign. Harris was one of the most liberal contenders for president back in 2020 and has since backtracked on some major issues recently.

McCormick said on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures that this election is “a contrast between strength and weakness.” He said that both Harris and Casey, who he is facing in the Senate race, have “an extreme liberal agenda.”

“And nowhere is that more clear than in energy,” he said. “Kamala Harris has said she wants to ban fracking, transition energy workers, she’s having a change of heart now that she’s running for president.”

Harris’s campaign told the Hill that she would not seek to ban fracking if she were elected. That was after previously telling CNN while running for president in 2019, “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”

McCormick, a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy and a combat veteran who has made a major name for himself in the world of business and finance, also tied Harris to the nearly four years of high inflation that the country has experienced. He also emphasized how fracking is an important economic driver for Pennsylvania.

“And listen, these are the same people — Casey, Harris — that said President Biden was OK until he wasn’t OK; they said excessive spending wouldn’t drive inflation,” McCormick said. “Energy is critical to Pennsylvania; we’ve got the fourth-largest natural gas reserves in the world, and this creates wonderful job opportunity for decades to come for Pennsylvanians.”

In another policy-position change that was first reported by the Washington Examiner, Harris’s campaign spokesperson said she no longer supports a federal job guarantee, an idea championed by some on the Left and Green New Deal proponents.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Rolling back energy-related regulations would be a major boost for the state, McCormick said during an interview about his economic vision a few months back.

“Dealing with all the environmental restrictions, all the liabilities that are associated with drilling and transferring energy, liquid gas in particular, that is really key to our economic renewal,” McCormick told the Washington Examiner.

2024-08-11 16:36:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fcongressional%2F3117800%2Fdave-mccormick-blasts-harris-over-past-support-for-banning-fracking%2F?w=600&h=450, Republican Senate contender Dave McCormick, who is running against Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), attacked Vice President Kamala Harris for changing her position on fracking after becoming the Democratic presidential nominee. Harris, who President Joe Biden endorsed after bowing out of the race last month, has reversed course on a number of issues since launching her,

Republican Senate contender Dave McCormick, who is running against Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), attacked Vice President Kamala Harris for changing her position on fracking after becoming the Democratic presidential nominee.

Harris, who President Joe Biden endorsed after bowing out of the race last month, has reversed course on a number of issues since launching her campaign. Harris was one of the most liberal contenders for president back in 2020 and has since backtracked on some major issues recently.

McCormick said on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures that this election is “a contrast between strength and weakness.” He said that both Harris and Casey, who he is facing in the Senate race, have “an extreme liberal agenda.”

“And nowhere is that more clear than in energy,” he said. “Kamala Harris has said she wants to ban fracking, transition energy workers, she’s having a change of heart now that she’s running for president.”

Harris’s campaign told the Hill that she would not seek to ban fracking if she were elected. That was after previously telling CNN while running for president in 2019, “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”

McCormick, a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy and a combat veteran who has made a major name for himself in the world of business and finance, also tied Harris to the nearly four years of high inflation that the country has experienced. He also emphasized how fracking is an important economic driver for Pennsylvania.

“And listen, these are the same people — Casey, Harris — that said President Biden was OK until he wasn’t OK; they said excessive spending wouldn’t drive inflation,” McCormick said. “Energy is critical to Pennsylvania; we’ve got the fourth-largest natural gas reserves in the world, and this creates wonderful job opportunity for decades to come for Pennsylvanians.”

In another policy-position change that was first reported by the Washington Examiner, Harris’s campaign spokesperson said she no longer supports a federal job guarantee, an idea championed by some on the Left and Green New Deal proponents.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Rolling back energy-related regulations would be a major boost for the state, McCormick said during an interview about his economic vision a few months back.

“Dealing with all the environmental restrictions, all the liabilities that are associated with drilling and transferring energy, liquid gas in particular, that is really key to our economic renewal,” McCormick told the Washington Examiner.

, Republican Senate contender Dave McCormick, who is running against Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), attacked Vice President Kamala Harris for changing her position on fracking after becoming the Democratic presidential nominee. Harris, who President Joe Biden endorsed after bowing out of the race last month, has reversed course on a number of issues since launching her campaign. Harris was one of the most liberal contenders for president back in 2020 and has since backtracked on some major issues recently. McCormick said on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures that this election is “a contrast between strength and weakness.” He said that both Harris and Casey, who he is facing in the Senate race, have “an extreme liberal agenda.” “And nowhere is that more clear than in energy,” he said. “Kamala Harris has said she wants to ban fracking, transition energy workers, she’s having a change of heart now that she’s running for president.” Harris’s campaign told the Hill that she would not seek to ban fracking if she were elected. That was after previously telling CNN while running for president in 2019, “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.” McCormick, a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy and a combat veteran who has made a major name for himself in the world of business and finance, also tied Harris to the nearly four years of high inflation that the country has experienced. He also emphasized how fracking is an important economic driver for Pennsylvania. “And listen, these are the same people — Casey, Harris — that said President Biden was OK until he wasn’t OK; they said excessive spending wouldn’t drive inflation,” McCormick said. “Energy is critical to Pennsylvania; we’ve got the fourth-largest natural gas reserves in the world, and this creates wonderful job opportunity for decades to come for Pennsylvanians.” In another policy-position change that was first reported by the Washington Examiner, Harris’s campaign spokesperson said she no longer supports a federal job guarantee, an idea championed by some on the Left and Green New Deal proponents. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER Rolling back energy-related regulations would be a major boost for the state, McCormick said during an interview about his economic vision a few months back. “Dealing with all the environmental restrictions, all the liabilities that are associated with drilling and transferring energy, liquid gas in particular, that is really key to our economic renewal,” McCormick told the Washington Examiner., , Dave McCormick blasts Harris over past support for banning fracking, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/mccormick-harris-fracking.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Hawaii’s Democratic incumbents sail to victory in primary thumbnail

Hawaii’s Democratic incumbents sail to victory in primary

Three of Hawaii’s Democratic congressional members cruised to victory on Saturday, lining them up to likely serve another term in the blue state.

Incumbent U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono and Reps. Jill Tokuda and Ed Case all won their respective races over the weekend. Hirono, who has served the state for more than a decade, easily won her primary election with more than 90% of the vote.

Meanwhile, Bob McDermott, a former member of Hawaii’s state legislature, won the Republican primary with nearly 52% of the vote and will mount a long-shot campaign to challenge Hirono in the fall. Since statehood, Hawaii has only elected one Republican to the Senate decades ago and has not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 1984.

Case easily won his primary race with more than 92% of the vote, lining up a general election matchup with Republican Patrick Largey, who ran uncontested in the GOP primary.

Tokuda ran for her seat unopposed and will be facing Republican Steven Bond, who also ran in the GOP primary unopposed, in the fall.

Hirono said on Saturday after the election that she is “honored and grateful” to Hawaiian voters for “once again putting their faith in me.”

“We can’t stop now. Work remains to protect our fundamental rights, defend our democracy, continue lowering costs, ensure Red Hill’s safe closure, and support Maui’s recovery,” Hirono said in a statement.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“I’m committed to continuing that work in the Senate and delivering for families across our state. We’re in this together,” she added.

Democratic primaries have gotten some attention this year, given rifts in the party over Israel’s war with Hamas. Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-MO) both lost to primary challengers this year amid pressure against the liberal “squad” members.

2024-08-11 15:58:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fcongressional%2F3117783%2Fhawaiis-democratic-incumbents-sail-to-victory-in-primary%2F?w=600&h=450, Three of Hawaii’s Democratic congressional members cruised to victory on Saturday, lining them up to likely serve another term in the blue state. Incumbent U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono and Reps. Jill Tokuda and Ed Case all won their respective races over the weekend. Hirono, who has served the state for more than a decade, easily,

Three of Hawaii’s Democratic congressional members cruised to victory on Saturday, lining them up to likely serve another term in the blue state.

Incumbent U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono and Reps. Jill Tokuda and Ed Case all won their respective races over the weekend. Hirono, who has served the state for more than a decade, easily won her primary election with more than 90% of the vote.

Meanwhile, Bob McDermott, a former member of Hawaii’s state legislature, won the Republican primary with nearly 52% of the vote and will mount a long-shot campaign to challenge Hirono in the fall. Since statehood, Hawaii has only elected one Republican to the Senate decades ago and has not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 1984.

Case easily won his primary race with more than 92% of the vote, lining up a general election matchup with Republican Patrick Largey, who ran uncontested in the GOP primary.

Tokuda ran for her seat unopposed and will be facing Republican Steven Bond, who also ran in the GOP primary unopposed, in the fall.

Hirono said on Saturday after the election that she is “honored and grateful” to Hawaiian voters for “once again putting their faith in me.”

“We can’t stop now. Work remains to protect our fundamental rights, defend our democracy, continue lowering costs, ensure Red Hill’s safe closure, and support Maui’s recovery,” Hirono said in a statement.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“I’m committed to continuing that work in the Senate and delivering for families across our state. We’re in this together,” she added.

Democratic primaries have gotten some attention this year, given rifts in the party over Israel’s war with Hamas. Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-MO) both lost to primary challengers this year amid pressure against the liberal “squad” members.

, Three of Hawaii’s Democratic congressional members cruised to victory on Saturday, lining them up to likely serve another term in the blue state. Incumbent U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono and Reps. Jill Tokuda and Ed Case all won their respective races over the weekend. Hirono, who has served the state for more than a decade, easily won her primary election with more than 90% of the vote. Meanwhile, Bob McDermott, a former member of Hawaii’s state legislature, won the Republican primary with nearly 52% of the vote and will mount a long-shot campaign to challenge Hirono in the fall. Since statehood, Hawaii has only elected one Republican to the Senate decades ago and has not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 1984. Case easily won his primary race with more than 92% of the vote, lining up a general election matchup with Republican Patrick Largey, who ran uncontested in the GOP primary. Tokuda ran for her seat unopposed and will be facing Republican Steven Bond, who also ran in the GOP primary unopposed, in the fall. Hirono said on Saturday after the election that she is “honored and grateful” to Hawaiian voters for “once again putting their faith in me.” “We can’t stop now. Work remains to protect our fundamental rights, defend our democracy, continue lowering costs, ensure Red Hill’s safe closure, and support Maui’s recovery,” Hirono said in a statement. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER “I’m committed to continuing that work in the Senate and delivering for families across our state. We’re in this together,” she added. Democratic primaries have gotten some attention this year, given rifts in the party over Israel’s war with Hamas. Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-MO) both lost to primary challengers this year amid pressure against the liberal “squad” members., , Hawaii’s Democratic incumbents sail to victory in primary, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/hawaii-primary-election.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Vance discusses Trump’s mass deportation plan: ‘Start with 1 million’ thumbnail

Vance discusses Trump’s mass deportation plan: ‘Start with 1 million’

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) said that the mass deportation of illegal immigrants proposed by former President Donald Trump should begin with 1 million people.

Vance discussed immigration policy on ABC’s This Week on Sunday morning. Vance, who was chosen as Trump’s running mate, said he was “extremely confident” in their chances of winning the election in November and elaborated on their immigration plan.

The remarks come after Trump discussed his plans to deport illegal immigrants during an interview with TIME earlier this year. During the interview, Trump discussed his plans to deport millions of people who are in the United States illegally should he be elected, saying that he would use the National Guard to help mobilize the effort.

“I don’t believe this is sustainable for a country, what’s happening to us, with probably 15 million and maybe as many as 20 million by the time Biden’s out,” Trump said. “Twenty million people, many of them from jails, many of them from prisons, many of them from mental institutions. I mean, you see what’s going on in Venezuela and other countries. They’re becoming a lot safer.”

Vance said that he and Trump would take a “sequential approach” to the matter.

“You start with what’s achievable,” Vance said. “I think that if you deport a lot of violent criminals and frankly if you make it harder to hire illegal labor, which undercuts the wages of American workers, I think you go a lot of the way to solving the illegal immigration problem.”

“I think it’s interesting that people focus on, well, how do you deport 18 million people? Let’s start with 1 million. That’s where Kamala Harris has failed. And then we can go from there,” Vance said.

Vance also discussed during the interview how he thinks the U.S. should be more pro-family. Vance, and other Republican lawmakers, have had concerns about the country’s declining birthrate and have pushed for pro-family policies.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

He also reacted to some of the criticism the campaign has received over comments he made about “childless cat ladies” while on then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s show and said his words had been distorted.

“Do I regret saying it? I regret that the media and the Kamala Harris campaign has, frankly, distorted what I said,” Vance said. “They turn this into a policy proposal that I never made. … I said, I want us to be more pro-family, and I do want us to be more pro-family.”

2024-08-11 15:02:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fpresidential%2F3117721%2Fvance-trump-mass-deportation-plan-start-1-million%2F?w=600&h=450, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) said that the mass deportation of illegal immigrants proposed by former President Donald Trump should begin with 1 million people. Vance discussed immigration policy on ABC’s This Week on Sunday morning. Vance, who was chosen as Trump’s running mate, said he was “extremely confident” in their chances of winning the election,

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) said that the mass deportation of illegal immigrants proposed by former President Donald Trump should begin with 1 million people.

Vance discussed immigration policy on ABC’s This Week on Sunday morning. Vance, who was chosen as Trump’s running mate, said he was “extremely confident” in their chances of winning the election in November and elaborated on their immigration plan.

The remarks come after Trump discussed his plans to deport illegal immigrants during an interview with TIME earlier this year. During the interview, Trump discussed his plans to deport millions of people who are in the United States illegally should he be elected, saying that he would use the National Guard to help mobilize the effort.

“I don’t believe this is sustainable for a country, what’s happening to us, with probably 15 million and maybe as many as 20 million by the time Biden’s out,” Trump said. “Twenty million people, many of them from jails, many of them from prisons, many of them from mental institutions. I mean, you see what’s going on in Venezuela and other countries. They’re becoming a lot safer.”

Vance said that he and Trump would take a “sequential approach” to the matter.

“You start with what’s achievable,” Vance said. “I think that if you deport a lot of violent criminals and frankly if you make it harder to hire illegal labor, which undercuts the wages of American workers, I think you go a lot of the way to solving the illegal immigration problem.”

“I think it’s interesting that people focus on, well, how do you deport 18 million people? Let’s start with 1 million. That’s where Kamala Harris has failed. And then we can go from there,” Vance said.

Vance also discussed during the interview how he thinks the U.S. should be more pro-family. Vance, and other Republican lawmakers, have had concerns about the country’s declining birthrate and have pushed for pro-family policies.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

He also reacted to some of the criticism the campaign has received over comments he made about “childless cat ladies” while on then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s show and said his words had been distorted.

“Do I regret saying it? I regret that the media and the Kamala Harris campaign has, frankly, distorted what I said,” Vance said. “They turn this into a policy proposal that I never made. … I said, I want us to be more pro-family, and I do want us to be more pro-family.”

, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) said that the mass deportation of illegal immigrants proposed by former President Donald Trump should begin with 1 million people. Vance discussed immigration policy on ABC’s This Week on Sunday morning. Vance, who was chosen as Trump’s running mate, said he was “extremely confident” in their chances of winning the election in November and elaborated on their immigration plan. The remarks come after Trump discussed his plans to deport illegal immigrants during an interview with TIME earlier this year. During the interview, Trump discussed his plans to deport millions of people who are in the United States illegally should he be elected, saying that he would use the National Guard to help mobilize the effort. “I don’t believe this is sustainable for a country, what’s happening to us, with probably 15 million and maybe as many as 20 million by the time Biden’s out,” Trump said. “Twenty million people, many of them from jails, many of them from prisons, many of them from mental institutions. I mean, you see what’s going on in Venezuela and other countries. They’re becoming a lot safer.” Vance said that he and Trump would take a “sequential approach” to the matter. “You start with what’s achievable,” Vance said. “I think that if you deport a lot of violent criminals and frankly if you make it harder to hire illegal labor, which undercuts the wages of American workers, I think you go a lot of the way to solving the illegal immigration problem.” “I think it’s interesting that people focus on, well, how do you deport 18 million people? Let’s start with 1 million. That’s where Kamala Harris has failed. And then we can go from there,” Vance said. Vance also discussed during the interview how he thinks the U.S. should be more pro-family. Vance, and other Republican lawmakers, have had concerns about the country’s declining birthrate and have pushed for pro-family policies. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER He also reacted to some of the criticism the campaign has received over comments he made about “childless cat ladies” while on then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s show and said his words had been distorted. “Do I regret saying it? I regret that the media and the Kamala Harris campaign has, frankly, distorted what I said,” Vance said. “They turn this into a policy proposal that I never made. … I said, I want us to be more pro-family, and I do want us to be more pro-family.”, , Vance discusses Trump’s mass deportation plan: ‘Start with 1 million’, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/vance-illegal-immigration.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Biden says staying in race would have been ‘a distraction’ for Democrats thumbnail

Biden says staying in race would have been ‘a distraction’ for Democrats

President Joe Biden said that if he had remained at the head of the Democratic ticket, it would have been “a distraction” for congressional Democrats running for office.

Biden, who announced last month he was bowing out of the presidential contest, made the remarks on CBS Sunday Morning when discussing his decision.

“Look, the polls we had showed that it was a neck and neck race; would have been down to the wire,” he said. “But what happened was a number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was gonna hurt them in the races.”

“And I was concerned if I stayed in the race, that would be the topic. You’d be interviewing me about why did Nancy Pelosi say, why did so– and– and I thought it’d be a real distraction, No. 1,” Biden added.

He also said that “maintaining this democracy” and defeating former President Donald Trump in November were other factors that led to the decision.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Biden’s decision to bow out as the Democratic nominee came after weeks of pressure from Democrats following his June debate performance against Trump where he appeared halting and at times confused.

Shortly after dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to lead the ticket. Since then, Democrats have rallied around Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

2024-08-11 14:50:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fpresidential%2F3117763%2Fbiden-staying-race-would-have-been-distraction-democrats%2F?w=600&h=450, President Joe Biden said that if he had remained at the head of the Democratic ticket, it would have been “a distraction” for congressional Democrats running for office. Biden, who announced last month he was bowing out of the presidential contest, made the remarks on CBS Sunday Morning when discussing his decision. “Look, the polls,

President Joe Biden said that if he had remained at the head of the Democratic ticket, it would have been “a distraction” for congressional Democrats running for office.

Biden, who announced last month he was bowing out of the presidential contest, made the remarks on CBS Sunday Morning when discussing his decision.

“Look, the polls we had showed that it was a neck and neck race; would have been down to the wire,” he said. “But what happened was a number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was gonna hurt them in the races.”

“And I was concerned if I stayed in the race, that would be the topic. You’d be interviewing me about why did Nancy Pelosi say, why did so– and– and I thought it’d be a real distraction, No. 1,” Biden added.

He also said that “maintaining this democracy” and defeating former President Donald Trump in November were other factors that led to the decision.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Biden’s decision to bow out as the Democratic nominee came after weeks of pressure from Democrats following his June debate performance against Trump where he appeared halting and at times confused.

Shortly after dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to lead the ticket. Since then, Democrats have rallied around Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

, President Joe Biden said that if he had remained at the head of the Democratic ticket, it would have been “a distraction” for congressional Democrats running for office. Biden, who announced last month he was bowing out of the presidential contest, made the remarks on CBS Sunday Morning when discussing his decision. “Look, the polls we had showed that it was a neck and neck race; would have been down to the wire,” he said. “But what happened was a number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was gonna hurt them in the races.” “And I was concerned if I stayed in the race, that would be the topic. You’d be interviewing me about why did Nancy Pelosi say, why did so– and– and I thought it’d be a real distraction, No. 1,” Biden added. President Biden sits down with CBS News chief election & campaign correspondent @costareports for his first interview since announcing his withdrawal from the presidential race. He talks about his decision and his family; his support of the Harris-Walz ticket; and what he sees as… pic.twitter.com/njNECYJVCV — CBS Sunday Morning (@CBSSunday) August 11, 2024 He also said that “maintaining this democracy” and defeating former President Donald Trump in November were other factors that led to the decision. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER Biden’s decision to bow out as the Democratic nominee came after weeks of pressure from Democrats following his June debate performance against Trump where he appeared halting and at times confused. Shortly after dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to lead the ticket. Since then, Democrats have rallied around Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz., , Biden says staying in race would have been ‘a distraction’ for Democrats, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/joe-biden-distraction.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Senate to vote on bipartisan child tax credit and business break bill thumbnail

Senate to vote on bipartisan child tax credit and business break bill

The full Senate will move toward a vote on a long-stalled bipartisan plan to expand the child tax credit and renew key business investment deductions.

The vote, which comes after months of uncertainty about the proposal, is expected not to succeed, but it will put Republicans on the record on the matter. Some Republicans in the Senate have fought to bat the legislation down for various reasons despite it sailing through the House with strong bipartisan support.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will file cloture on the legislation tonight, and the first procedural vote will occur later this week, according to a Schumer spokesman.

The proposal is the result of lengthy talks between Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR). It passed the House in a 357-70 vote, with members of both parties supporting the $78 billion legislation, H.R. 7024, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act.

The main tax legislation notably expands the child tax credit by changing the calculation of the credit on a per-child basis to make it more generous. It would also increase the maximum refundable amount per child from $1,600 to $1,800 in tax year 2023, $1,900 in 2024, and $2,000 in 2025, a change that will benefit lower-income families.

It also indexes the child tax credit to inflation, a provision long sought by child tax credit advocates.

The bipartisan bill renews a tax deduction for research and development costs for businesses, a measure that business groups have been lobbying for and the GOP has prioritized. Since the break expired, companies have had to amortize R&D expenses, meaning they faced a higher tax burden.

The agreement also temporarily pauses the phaseout of bonus depreciation. That was a provision in the 2017 Trump tax cuts that allowed companies to write off certain capital expenditures immediately instead of having those deductions written off over the “useful life” of the asset.

After easily passing through the Senate, the bill faced major roadblocks in the House. Wyden’s counterpart on the Finance Committee, Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID), has pushed back on the legislation.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Some GOP senators have objected to a provision in the legislation that would allow parents to rely on the prior year’s income to calculate the child tax credit for this year and next. Outside conservative groups have argued that the provision would lead some parents to quit the workforce in some years.

After it passed the House, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), an influential member of the Finance Committee, told the Washington Examiner that in its current iteration, he was “going to fight to make sure every single Republican member is opposed to it.”

2024-07-29 21:47:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fsenate%2F3103600%2Fsenate-vote-bipartisan-child-tax-credit-business-break-bill%2F?w=600&h=450, The full Senate will move toward a vote on a long-stalled bipartisan plan to expand the child tax credit and renew key business investment deductions. The vote, which comes after months of uncertainty about the proposal, is expected not to succeed, but it will put Republicans on the record on the matter. Some Republicans in,

The full Senate will move toward a vote on a long-stalled bipartisan plan to expand the child tax credit and renew key business investment deductions.

The vote, which comes after months of uncertainty about the proposal, is expected not to succeed, but it will put Republicans on the record on the matter. Some Republicans in the Senate have fought to bat the legislation down for various reasons despite it sailing through the House with strong bipartisan support.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will file cloture on the legislation tonight, and the first procedural vote will occur later this week, according to a Schumer spokesman.

The proposal is the result of lengthy talks between Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR). It passed the House in a 357-70 vote, with members of both parties supporting the $78 billion legislation, H.R. 7024, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act.

The main tax legislation notably expands the child tax credit by changing the calculation of the credit on a per-child basis to make it more generous. It would also increase the maximum refundable amount per child from $1,600 to $1,800 in tax year 2023, $1,900 in 2024, and $2,000 in 2025, a change that will benefit lower-income families.

It also indexes the child tax credit to inflation, a provision long sought by child tax credit advocates.

The bipartisan bill renews a tax deduction for research and development costs for businesses, a measure that business groups have been lobbying for and the GOP has prioritized. Since the break expired, companies have had to amortize R&D expenses, meaning they faced a higher tax burden.

The agreement also temporarily pauses the phaseout of bonus depreciation. That was a provision in the 2017 Trump tax cuts that allowed companies to write off certain capital expenditures immediately instead of having those deductions written off over the “useful life” of the asset.

After easily passing through the Senate, the bill faced major roadblocks in the House. Wyden’s counterpart on the Finance Committee, Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID), has pushed back on the legislation.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Some GOP senators have objected to a provision in the legislation that would allow parents to rely on the prior year’s income to calculate the child tax credit for this year and next. Outside conservative groups have argued that the provision would lead some parents to quit the workforce in some years.

After it passed the House, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), an influential member of the Finance Committee, told the Washington Examiner that in its current iteration, he was “going to fight to make sure every single Republican member is opposed to it.”

, The full Senate will move toward a vote on a long-stalled bipartisan plan to expand the child tax credit and renew key business investment deductions. The vote, which comes after months of uncertainty about the proposal, is expected not to succeed, but it will put Republicans on the record on the matter. Some Republicans in the Senate have fought to bat the legislation down for various reasons despite it sailing through the House with strong bipartisan support. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will file cloture on the legislation tonight, and the first procedural vote will occur later this week, according to a Schumer spokesman. The proposal is the result of lengthy talks between Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR). It passed the House in a 357-70 vote, with members of both parties supporting the $78 billion legislation, H.R. 7024, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act. The main tax legislation notably expands the child tax credit by changing the calculation of the credit on a per-child basis to make it more generous. It would also increase the maximum refundable amount per child from $1,600 to $1,800 in tax year 2023, $1,900 in 2024, and $2,000 in 2025, a change that will benefit lower-income families. It also indexes the child tax credit to inflation, a provision long sought by child tax credit advocates. The bipartisan bill renews a tax deduction for research and development costs for businesses, a measure that business groups have been lobbying for and the GOP has prioritized. Since the break expired, companies have had to amortize R&D expenses, meaning they faced a higher tax burden. The agreement also temporarily pauses the phaseout of bonus depreciation. That was a provision in the 2017 Trump tax cuts that allowed companies to write off certain capital expenditures immediately instead of having those deductions written off over the “useful life” of the asset. After easily passing through the Senate, the bill faced major roadblocks in the House. Wyden’s counterpart on the Finance Committee, Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID), has pushed back on the legislation. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER Some GOP senators have objected to a provision in the legislation that would allow parents to rely on the prior year’s income to calculate the child tax credit for this year and next. Outside conservative groups have argued that the provision would lead some parents to quit the workforce in some years. After it passed the House, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), an influential member of the Finance Committee, told the Washington Examiner that in its current iteration, he was “going to fight to make sure every single Republican member is opposed to it.”, , Senate to vote on bipartisan child tax credit and business break bill, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/senate-child-tax-credit.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

Economic conditions looking a bit more favorable for Harris thumbnail

Economic conditions looking a bit more favorable for Harris

Strong gross domestic product numbers, slowing inflation, and a coming interest rate cut are all good news for Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign as she seeks to convince voters she would be a strong steward of the economy.

President Joe Biden had been weighed down by poor economic approval ratings before he exited the race, and while Harris will undoubtedly be tied to Biden’s handling of the economy, the separation does give her a bit of wiggle room.

And fresh macroeconomic data since Harris became the presumptive Democratic nominee have been moving in the right direction for her political prospects. Inflation, while still high, is falling, GDP is increasing at a healthy clip, and the Federal Reserve is poised to cut interest rates.

“The macroeconomic numbers have been trending in the right direction and what you have now is a presumptive Democratic nominee who will be able to make the argument more effectively than President Biden,” Brian Marks, executive director of the University of New Haven’s Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, told the Washington Examiner.

The biggest economic complaint from voters is inflation, which amounts to 19% cumulatively since Biden entered office. Annual inflation, or price growth measured from the preceding 12 months, peaked around 9% but has since fallen back to more manageable levels.

The Fed considers healthy inflation to be 2%. On Friday, the personal consumption expenditures index for June was released and showed inflation falling once again, though slightly, to 2.5%. Any decline is good news for Harris, especially after inflation became stagnant earlier this year and even moved up at times.

“Inflation had stalled out in the first four months of the year, and that delayed the timetable for the Fed to start cutting interest rates,” Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate, told the Washington Examiner.

Still, Republicans are pointing out that the slowing inflation is too little too late and that former President Donald Trump would be much better for the economy. They also blame inflation itself on the fiscal and monetary stimulus under Biden. Republicans point to Trump’s first term in office, when the economy was strong and unemployment was low until the pandemic took hold.

Many people have already decided who they are going to vote for in the 2024 contest, so changes in macroeconomic data are unlikely to make them budge. Economic models suggest that relatively major swings in incoming data would be required to tip the election.

While inflation declining a bit more is not likely to tip the scales of many voters who are very dissatisfied with nearly four years of cumulative inflation, McBride noted that it does open the door for a preelection rate cut.

“Next week, the Fed does meet, and they’re not going to cut interest rates this time, but they will tee things up to be able to cut interest rates in September, provided the economic data continues to cooperate,” he said.

The Fed will hold two meetings before the election, one next week and one in September. The odds of the Fed cutting rates before the election are now about 88%, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, which calculates the probability using futures contract prices for rates in the short-term market targeted by the Fed. That is up from just over 50% odds of a preelection rate cut a month ago.

In other good economic news, and good news for Harris, the economy expanded even more than analysts had expected in the second quarter of this year, which spanned from April to June.

The economy grew at a robust 2.8% seasonally adjusted annual rate in the second quarter of this year, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported Thursday in a preliminary estimate. The consensus among economists was that GDP would increase at a 2% rate.

And while the report will be updated twice in the weeks ahead, the strong preliminary estimate is an indication that the economy has been humming right along. It is also a notable increase from the 1.4% growth in the first quarter.

“The economic growth for the second quarter surprised to upside, well exceeding expectations and a growth rate that was double what we had seen in the first quarter,” McBride said. “That number is going to get revised a couple more times, but it so far exceeded expectations that even revisions probably won’t take much bloom off the rose.”

Taken together, all of these things are good news for Harris, who is trying to differentiate herself from Biden, touting her time in office while working to avoid being pulled down by Biden’s low economic approval ratings.

Marks said he thinks Harris will be able to make the argument that inflation is meaningfully falling more effectively than Biden has been able to. Bidenworld briefly tried to brand positive economic developments as “Bidenomics,” but the rebrand didn’t appear to help his approval ratings and in some cases even backfired, with Republicans using Bidenomics as a pejorative.

“In this regard, with all the indicators, it will be positive news for her, and she will be more able to make the effective argument as opposed to a surrogate,” he said.

Republicans will undoubtedly work to paint Harris as a continuation of Biden and his economic policies. For instance, Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) has already taken to pinning the inflation that voters have felt to the vice president.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“Every day, the American Dream moves further out of reach, and hardworking Americans are feeling the consequences of the Harris Price Hikes everywhere — from the grocery store, to paying rent, to filling up their cars to get to work,” he said.

“The failures of Bidenomics and the pain caused by Harris Price Hikes mean small businesses are being forced to close, Americans are having to take on multiple jobs to make ends meet, and even seniors are coming out of retirement because they cannot afford to not work,” Scott added.

2024-07-28 08:00:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fpresidential%2F3101156%2Feconomic-conditions-bit-more-favorable-harris%2F?w=600&h=450, Strong gross domestic product numbers, slowing inflation, and a coming interest rate cut are all good news for Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign as she seeks to convince voters she would be a strong steward of the economy. President Joe Biden had been weighed down by poor economic approval ratings before he exited the race,

Strong gross domestic product numbers, slowing inflation, and a coming interest rate cut are all good news for Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign as she seeks to convince voters she would be a strong steward of the economy.

President Joe Biden had been weighed down by poor economic approval ratings before he exited the race, and while Harris will undoubtedly be tied to Biden’s handling of the economy, the separation does give her a bit of wiggle room.

And fresh macroeconomic data since Harris became the presumptive Democratic nominee have been moving in the right direction for her political prospects. Inflation, while still high, is falling, GDP is increasing at a healthy clip, and the Federal Reserve is poised to cut interest rates.

“The macroeconomic numbers have been trending in the right direction and what you have now is a presumptive Democratic nominee who will be able to make the argument more effectively than President Biden,” Brian Marks, executive director of the University of New Haven’s Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, told the Washington Examiner.

The biggest economic complaint from voters is inflation, which amounts to 19% cumulatively since Biden entered office. Annual inflation, or price growth measured from the preceding 12 months, peaked around 9% but has since fallen back to more manageable levels.

The Fed considers healthy inflation to be 2%. On Friday, the personal consumption expenditures index for June was released and showed inflation falling once again, though slightly, to 2.5%. Any decline is good news for Harris, especially after inflation became stagnant earlier this year and even moved up at times.

“Inflation had stalled out in the first four months of the year, and that delayed the timetable for the Fed to start cutting interest rates,” Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate, told the Washington Examiner.

Still, Republicans are pointing out that the slowing inflation is too little too late and that former President Donald Trump would be much better for the economy. They also blame inflation itself on the fiscal and monetary stimulus under Biden. Republicans point to Trump’s first term in office, when the economy was strong and unemployment was low until the pandemic took hold.

Many people have already decided who they are going to vote for in the 2024 contest, so changes in macroeconomic data are unlikely to make them budge. Economic models suggest that relatively major swings in incoming data would be required to tip the election.

While inflation declining a bit more is not likely to tip the scales of many voters who are very dissatisfied with nearly four years of cumulative inflation, McBride noted that it does open the door for a preelection rate cut.

“Next week, the Fed does meet, and they’re not going to cut interest rates this time, but they will tee things up to be able to cut interest rates in September, provided the economic data continues to cooperate,” he said.

The Fed will hold two meetings before the election, one next week and one in September. The odds of the Fed cutting rates before the election are now about 88%, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, which calculates the probability using futures contract prices for rates in the short-term market targeted by the Fed. That is up from just over 50% odds of a preelection rate cut a month ago.

In other good economic news, and good news for Harris, the economy expanded even more than analysts had expected in the second quarter of this year, which spanned from April to June.

The economy grew at a robust 2.8% seasonally adjusted annual rate in the second quarter of this year, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported Thursday in a preliminary estimate. The consensus among economists was that GDP would increase at a 2% rate.

And while the report will be updated twice in the weeks ahead, the strong preliminary estimate is an indication that the economy has been humming right along. It is also a notable increase from the 1.4% growth in the first quarter.

“The economic growth for the second quarter surprised to upside, well exceeding expectations and a growth rate that was double what we had seen in the first quarter,” McBride said. “That number is going to get revised a couple more times, but it so far exceeded expectations that even revisions probably won’t take much bloom off the rose.”

Taken together, all of these things are good news for Harris, who is trying to differentiate herself from Biden, touting her time in office while working to avoid being pulled down by Biden’s low economic approval ratings.

Marks said he thinks Harris will be able to make the argument that inflation is meaningfully falling more effectively than Biden has been able to. Bidenworld briefly tried to brand positive economic developments as “Bidenomics,” but the rebrand didn’t appear to help his approval ratings and in some cases even backfired, with Republicans using Bidenomics as a pejorative.

“In this regard, with all the indicators, it will be positive news for her, and she will be more able to make the effective argument as opposed to a surrogate,” he said.

Republicans will undoubtedly work to paint Harris as a continuation of Biden and his economic policies. For instance, Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) has already taken to pinning the inflation that voters have felt to the vice president.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“Every day, the American Dream moves further out of reach, and hardworking Americans are feeling the consequences of the Harris Price Hikes everywhere — from the grocery store, to paying rent, to filling up their cars to get to work,” he said.

“The failures of Bidenomics and the pain caused by Harris Price Hikes mean small businesses are being forced to close, Americans are having to take on multiple jobs to make ends meet, and even seniors are coming out of retirement because they cannot afford to not work,” Scott added.

, Strong gross domestic product numbers, slowing inflation, and a coming interest rate cut are all good news for Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign as she seeks to convince voters she would be a strong steward of the economy. President Joe Biden had been weighed down by poor economic approval ratings before he exited the race, and while Harris will undoubtedly be tied to Biden’s handling of the economy, the separation does give her a bit of wiggle room. And fresh macroeconomic data since Harris became the presumptive Democratic nominee have been moving in the right direction for her political prospects. Inflation, while still high, is falling, GDP is increasing at a healthy clip, and the Federal Reserve is poised to cut interest rates. “The macroeconomic numbers have been trending in the right direction and what you have now is a presumptive Democratic nominee who will be able to make the argument more effectively than President Biden,” Brian Marks, executive director of the University of New Haven’s Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, told the Washington Examiner. The biggest economic complaint from voters is inflation, which amounts to 19% cumulatively since Biden entered office. Annual inflation, or price growth measured from the preceding 12 months, peaked around 9% but has since fallen back to more manageable levels. The Fed considers healthy inflation to be 2%. On Friday, the personal consumption expenditures index for June was released and showed inflation falling once again, though slightly, to 2.5%. Any decline is good news for Harris, especially after inflation became stagnant earlier this year and even moved up at times. “Inflation had stalled out in the first four months of the year, and that delayed the timetable for the Fed to start cutting interest rates,” Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate, told the Washington Examiner. Still, Republicans are pointing out that the slowing inflation is too little too late and that former President Donald Trump would be much better for the economy. They also blame inflation itself on the fiscal and monetary stimulus under Biden. Republicans point to Trump’s first term in office, when the economy was strong and unemployment was low until the pandemic took hold. Many people have already decided who they are going to vote for in the 2024 contest, so changes in macroeconomic data are unlikely to make them budge. Economic models suggest that relatively major swings in incoming data would be required to tip the election. While inflation declining a bit more is not likely to tip the scales of many voters who are very dissatisfied with nearly four years of cumulative inflation, McBride noted that it does open the door for a preelection rate cut. “Next week, the Fed does meet, and they’re not going to cut interest rates this time, but they will tee things up to be able to cut interest rates in September, provided the economic data continues to cooperate,” he said. The Fed will hold two meetings before the election, one next week and one in September. The odds of the Fed cutting rates before the election are now about 88%, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, which calculates the probability using futures contract prices for rates in the short-term market targeted by the Fed. That is up from just over 50% odds of a preelection rate cut a month ago. In other good economic news, and good news for Harris, the economy expanded even more than analysts had expected in the second quarter of this year, which spanned from April to June. The economy grew at a robust 2.8% seasonally adjusted annual rate in the second quarter of this year, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported Thursday in a preliminary estimate. The consensus among economists was that GDP would increase at a 2% rate. And while the report will be updated twice in the weeks ahead, the strong preliminary estimate is an indication that the economy has been humming right along. It is also a notable increase from the 1.4% growth in the first quarter. “The economic growth for the second quarter surprised to upside, well exceeding expectations and a growth rate that was double what we had seen in the first quarter,” McBride said. “That number is going to get revised a couple more times, but it so far exceeded expectations that even revisions probably won’t take much bloom off the rose.” Taken together, all of these things are good news for Harris, who is trying to differentiate herself from Biden, touting her time in office while working to avoid being pulled down by Biden’s low economic approval ratings. Marks said he thinks Harris will be able to make the argument that inflation is meaningfully falling more effectively than Biden has been able to. Bidenworld briefly tried to brand positive economic developments as “Bidenomics,” but the rebrand didn’t appear to help his approval ratings and in some cases even backfired, with Republicans using Bidenomics as a pejorative. “In this regard, with all the indicators, it will be positive news for her, and she will be more able to make the effective argument as opposed to a surrogate,” he said. Republicans will undoubtedly work to paint Harris as a continuation of Biden and his economic policies. For instance, Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) has already taken to pinning the inflation that voters have felt to the vice president. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER “Every day, the American Dream moves further out of reach, and hardworking Americans are feeling the consequences of the Harris Price Hikes everywhere — from the grocery store, to paying rent, to filling up their cars to get to work,” he said. “The failures of Bidenomics and the pain caused by Harris Price Hikes mean small businesses are being forced to close, Americans are having to take on multiple jobs to make ends meet, and even seniors are coming out of retirement because they cannot afford to not work,” Scott added., , Economic conditions looking a bit more favorable for Harris, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/harris-economic-news.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,

GOP Michigan Senate contender backs key Trump trade priority thumbnail

GOP Michigan Senate contender backs key Trump trade priority

EXCLUSIVE — Former Rep. Mike Rogers, who is running for Senate, said that he supports a proposal that would give the president power to impose reciprocal tariffs.

Rogers, who served in Congress from 2001 to 2015, including as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told the Washington Examiner during an interview that he supports former President Donald Trump’s push to pass the Reciprocal Trade Act, a law that would give the president further control over the tariffs that the United States imposes.

Still, notably, Rogers did not go as far as endorsing the idea of 10% across-the-board tariffs — an idea that Trump has floated and would be a tectonic shift in U.S. trade policy and a massive departure from supply-side economics that have long dominated the Republican Party.

But Rogers said he likes the reciprocal tariff plan, which would allow the president to unilaterally impose tariffs of equal size placed by other countries on the U.S.

“If you have a tariff on a product, we should be able to match that product,” Rogers said. “That would be my preferred way to do it, and I think that is wholly appropriate.”

“I’m a free-market guy, but that’s not a fair market when they can charge a tariff and we don’t,” Rogers added.

Rogers, 61, is the Republican front-runner in the GOP Senate primary, which will be held next month. A RealClearPolitics average of polls shows he is leading former Rep. Justin Amash by a large degree. Amash is known as a libertarian.

Rogers brushed Amash aside during the interview, pointing out how Amash left the GOP while in Congress. Amash became an independent in 2019 and then joined the Libertarian Party in 2020 before announcing his candidacy in the GOP Senate primary earlier this year.

Rogers, who served as a special agent with the FBI prior to entering Congress, also said on Tuesday that he preferred lower taxes. A major agenda item for Republicans is extending or making permanent provisions in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that have expired or are set to expire next year.

“There’s no tax cut I don’t like,” Rogers said.

He also expressed some openness to a lower corporate tax rate but said a decision on that would need to be closely examined in the broader context of tax policy.

“I would look at the number and see how we would balance it out with everything else we are trying to accomplish,” Rogers said. He added that a corporate tax is a tax on jobs “period, pure and simple.”

The former congressman said it is a priority to keep companies in the U.S. rather than losing them to low-tax jurisdictions. The 2017 tax overhaul lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Democrats generally favor raising it. Trump has called for lowering it further. In recent months, though, some Republicans have suggested that the rate might be allowed to rise to pay for other priorities, a development that reflects the populist pressures at work on the party.

The Medicare trust fund will be exhausted in 2036, and the combined Social Security trust fund will become exhausted in 2035, the programs’ trustees projected in May. Rogers said it is crucial that the issue is addressed and thinks that the only way to do so would be to create “a true bipartisan commission” and implement whatever recommendations the panel has.

The idea of a bipartisan fiscal commission is one that got attention last year thanks to the support of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), who endorsed such a panel.

In January, the House Budget Committee voted to advance bipartisan legislation that would form a panel consisting of both Republican and Democratic lawmakers from both chambers of Congress, in addition to outside experts. The committee would work to produce a report and propose legislation that would stabilize the ratio of public debt to GDP to at or below 100% within 10 years.

But the politics are tricky. Some lawmakers have embraced the idea, but others have shied away over perceptions that they could be seen as wanting to cut Social Security and Medicare.

On the energy front, Rogers supports “all of the above” energy policies. Like most GOP candidates this election cycle, he wants to boost domestic production of energy.

Rogers is also “absolutely” a fan of nuclear energy and said he wants to see that capacity built out across the U.S. He pointed specifically to small modular reactors, which are smaller in size than traditional nuclear reactors. Because of their smaller size, SMRs are safer and less cost-prohibitive. He also pointed out that nuclear power is clean.

“I think they can be a quick energy solver for us, certainly would impact carbon in the air, it’s a zero-emission energy, and it’s something that we can do internal to the United States,” Rogers said.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Rogers also blames the Biden administration for the country’s worst bout of inflation in decades. He believes too much federal spending under Biden caused the inflation wave and that such spending needs to be reined in.

If he clinches the Republican nomination on Aug. 6, Rogers is expected to face Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) in the general election. Slotkin is currently polling ahead of Rogers in the general election, according to RealClearPolitics.

2024-07-24 07:00:00, http://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns%2Fcongressional%2F3096545%2Fgop-michigan-senate-contender-backs-key-trump-trade-priority%2F?w=600&h=450, EXCLUSIVE — Former Rep. Mike Rogers, who is running for Senate, said that he supports a proposal that would give the president power to impose reciprocal tariffs. Rogers, who served in Congress from 2001 to 2015, including as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told the Washington Examiner during an interview that he supports former,

EXCLUSIVE — Former Rep. Mike Rogers, who is running for Senate, said that he supports a proposal that would give the president power to impose reciprocal tariffs.

Rogers, who served in Congress from 2001 to 2015, including as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told the Washington Examiner during an interview that he supports former President Donald Trump’s push to pass the Reciprocal Trade Act, a law that would give the president further control over the tariffs that the United States imposes.

Still, notably, Rogers did not go as far as endorsing the idea of 10% across-the-board tariffs — an idea that Trump has floated and would be a tectonic shift in U.S. trade policy and a massive departure from supply-side economics that have long dominated the Republican Party.

But Rogers said he likes the reciprocal tariff plan, which would allow the president to unilaterally impose tariffs of equal size placed by other countries on the U.S.

“If you have a tariff on a product, we should be able to match that product,” Rogers said. “That would be my preferred way to do it, and I think that is wholly appropriate.”

“I’m a free-market guy, but that’s not a fair market when they can charge a tariff and we don’t,” Rogers added.

Rogers, 61, is the Republican front-runner in the GOP Senate primary, which will be held next month. A RealClearPolitics average of polls shows he is leading former Rep. Justin Amash by a large degree. Amash is known as a libertarian.

Rogers brushed Amash aside during the interview, pointing out how Amash left the GOP while in Congress. Amash became an independent in 2019 and then joined the Libertarian Party in 2020 before announcing his candidacy in the GOP Senate primary earlier this year.

Rogers, who served as a special agent with the FBI prior to entering Congress, also said on Tuesday that he preferred lower taxes. A major agenda item for Republicans is extending or making permanent provisions in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that have expired or are set to expire next year.

“There’s no tax cut I don’t like,” Rogers said.

He also expressed some openness to a lower corporate tax rate but said a decision on that would need to be closely examined in the broader context of tax policy.

“I would look at the number and see how we would balance it out with everything else we are trying to accomplish,” Rogers said. He added that a corporate tax is a tax on jobs “period, pure and simple.”

The former congressman said it is a priority to keep companies in the U.S. rather than losing them to low-tax jurisdictions. The 2017 tax overhaul lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Democrats generally favor raising it. Trump has called for lowering it further. In recent months, though, some Republicans have suggested that the rate might be allowed to rise to pay for other priorities, a development that reflects the populist pressures at work on the party.

The Medicare trust fund will be exhausted in 2036, and the combined Social Security trust fund will become exhausted in 2035, the programs’ trustees projected in May. Rogers said it is crucial that the issue is addressed and thinks that the only way to do so would be to create “a true bipartisan commission” and implement whatever recommendations the panel has.

The idea of a bipartisan fiscal commission is one that got attention last year thanks to the support of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), who endorsed such a panel.

In January, the House Budget Committee voted to advance bipartisan legislation that would form a panel consisting of both Republican and Democratic lawmakers from both chambers of Congress, in addition to outside experts. The committee would work to produce a report and propose legislation that would stabilize the ratio of public debt to GDP to at or below 100% within 10 years.

But the politics are tricky. Some lawmakers have embraced the idea, but others have shied away over perceptions that they could be seen as wanting to cut Social Security and Medicare.

On the energy front, Rogers supports “all of the above” energy policies. Like most GOP candidates this election cycle, he wants to boost domestic production of energy.

Rogers is also “absolutely” a fan of nuclear energy and said he wants to see that capacity built out across the U.S. He pointed specifically to small modular reactors, which are smaller in size than traditional nuclear reactors. Because of their smaller size, SMRs are safer and less cost-prohibitive. He also pointed out that nuclear power is clean.

“I think they can be a quick energy solver for us, certainly would impact carbon in the air, it’s a zero-emission energy, and it’s something that we can do internal to the United States,” Rogers said.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Rogers also blames the Biden administration for the country’s worst bout of inflation in decades. He believes too much federal spending under Biden caused the inflation wave and that such spending needs to be reined in.

If he clinches the Republican nomination on Aug. 6, Rogers is expected to face Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) in the general election. Slotkin is currently polling ahead of Rogers in the general election, according to RealClearPolitics.

, EXCLUSIVE — Former Rep. Mike Rogers, who is running for Senate, said that he supports a proposal that would give the president power to impose reciprocal tariffs. Rogers, who served in Congress from 2001 to 2015, including as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told the Washington Examiner during an interview that he supports former President Donald Trump’s push to pass the Reciprocal Trade Act, a law that would give the president further control over the tariffs that the United States imposes. Still, notably, Rogers did not go as far as endorsing the idea of 10% across-the-board tariffs — an idea that Trump has floated and would be a tectonic shift in U.S. trade policy and a massive departure from supply-side economics that have long dominated the Republican Party. But Rogers said he likes the reciprocal tariff plan, which would allow the president to unilaterally impose tariffs of equal size placed by other countries on the U.S. “If you have a tariff on a product, we should be able to match that product,” Rogers said. “That would be my preferred way to do it, and I think that is wholly appropriate.” “I’m a free-market guy, but that’s not a fair market when they can charge a tariff and we don’t,” Rogers added. Rogers, 61, is the Republican front-runner in the GOP Senate primary, which will be held next month. A RealClearPolitics average of polls shows he is leading former Rep. Justin Amash by a large degree. Amash is known as a libertarian. Rogers brushed Amash aside during the interview, pointing out how Amash left the GOP while in Congress. Amash became an independent in 2019 and then joined the Libertarian Party in 2020 before announcing his candidacy in the GOP Senate primary earlier this year. Rogers, who served as a special agent with the FBI prior to entering Congress, also said on Tuesday that he preferred lower taxes. A major agenda item for Republicans is extending or making permanent provisions in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that have expired or are set to expire next year. “There’s no tax cut I don’t like,” Rogers said. He also expressed some openness to a lower corporate tax rate but said a decision on that would need to be closely examined in the broader context of tax policy. “I would look at the number and see how we would balance it out with everything else we are trying to accomplish,” Rogers said. He added that a corporate tax is a tax on jobs “period, pure and simple.” The former congressman said it is a priority to keep companies in the U.S. rather than losing them to low-tax jurisdictions. The 2017 tax overhaul lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Democrats generally favor raising it. Trump has called for lowering it further. In recent months, though, some Republicans have suggested that the rate might be allowed to rise to pay for other priorities, a development that reflects the populist pressures at work on the party. The Medicare trust fund will be exhausted in 2036, and the combined Social Security trust fund will become exhausted in 2035, the programs’ trustees projected in May. Rogers said it is crucial that the issue is addressed and thinks that the only way to do so would be to create “a true bipartisan commission” and implement whatever recommendations the panel has. The idea of a bipartisan fiscal commission is one that got attention last year thanks to the support of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), who endorsed such a panel. In January, the House Budget Committee voted to advance bipartisan legislation that would form a panel consisting of both Republican and Democratic lawmakers from both chambers of Congress, in addition to outside experts. The committee would work to produce a report and propose legislation that would stabilize the ratio of public debt to GDP to at or below 100% within 10 years. But the politics are tricky. Some lawmakers have embraced the idea, but others have shied away over perceptions that they could be seen as wanting to cut Social Security and Medicare. On the energy front, Rogers supports “all of the above” energy policies. Like most GOP candidates this election cycle, he wants to boost domestic production of energy. Rogers is also “absolutely” a fan of nuclear energy and said he wants to see that capacity built out across the U.S. He pointed specifically to small modular reactors, which are smaller in size than traditional nuclear reactors. Because of their smaller size, SMRs are safer and less cost-prohibitive. He also pointed out that nuclear power is clean. “I think they can be a quick energy solver for us, certainly would impact carbon in the air, it’s a zero-emission energy, and it’s something that we can do internal to the United States,” Rogers said. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER Rogers also blames the Biden administration for the country’s worst bout of inflation in decades. He believes too much federal spending under Biden caused the inflation wave and that such spending needs to be reined in. If he clinches the Republican nomination on Aug. 6, Rogers is expected to face Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) in the general election. Slotkin is currently polling ahead of Rogers in the general election, according to RealClearPolitics., , GOP Michigan Senate contender backs key Trump trade priority, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/mike-rogers-interview.webp, Washington Examiner, Political News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32×32.png, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feed/, Zachary Halaschak,