Reporter’s Notebook: Jamaal Bowman’s fallout from recent primaries thumbnail

Reporter’s Notebook: Jamaal Bowman’s fallout from recent primaries

Washington Examiner Congressional Reporter Samantha-Jo Roth joins Magazine Executive Editor Jim Antle to discuss Rep. Jamaal Bowman‘s (D-NY) fallout from recent primaries, what challenges progressive parties are facing with lobbying groups, the candidates affected by these challenges, if the cryptocurrency industry has an effect on swing-state voters, and that Utah Republicans chose their successor to Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT).

Philadelphia newspaper calls for Donald Trump to drop out of the presidential election thumbnail

Philadelphia newspaper calls for Donald Trump to drop out of the presidential election

President Joe Biden’s performance in the presidential debate last Thursday has drawn much criticism. Many have claimed that he looked lost and confused. Others have suggested it revealed a decline in his abilities. With most polls showing he lost the debate to former President Donald Trump, a growing number of people have suggested that he should be replaced as the Democrat’s nominee. However, the Philadelphia Inquirer took an alternative position over the weekend and suggested that Trump, not Biden, should withdraw from the race.

“President Joe Biden’s debate performance was a disaster. His disjointed responses and dazed look sparked calls for him to drop out of the presidential race,” the Inquirer’s editorial read. “But lost in the hand wringing was Donald Trump’s usual bombastic litany of lies, hyperbole, bigotry, ignorance, and fear mongering. His performance demonstrated once again that he is a danger to democracy and unfit for office.”

The suggestion that Trump should step down from Philadelphia’s main newspaper comes after four major newspapers from around the country called for Biden to step down as the Democratic nominee. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Chicago Tribune, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal all suggested Biden should step down. 

“At Thursday’s debate, the president needed to convince the American public that he was equal to the formidable demands of the office he is seeking to hold for another term. Voters, however, cannot be expected to ignore what was instead plain to see: Mr. Biden is not the man he was four years ago,” read the New York Times editorial.

“Mr. Trump at least looked vigorous and reminded voters of the pre-Covid economy. Mr. Biden looked like a feeble man no American should want going head to head with Mr. Putin or China’s Xi Jinping,” the Wall Street Journal wrote.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, however, disagreed. Despite briefly acknowledging Biden’s troubling performance, the publication considered Biden a lesser threat and provided a number of reasons why Trump should indeed leave the race.

“To build himself up, Trump constantly tears the country down. There is no shining city on the hill. It’s just mourning in America,” the Inquirer editorial board wrote. “Throughout the debate, Trump repeatedly said we are a ‘failing’ country. He called the United States a ‘third world nation.’ He said, ‘we’re living in hell’ and ‘very close to World War III.’

“Yes, Biden had a horrible night,” read the editorial. “He’s 81 and not as sharp as he used to be. But Biden on his worst day remains lightyears better than Trump on his best.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Philly’s newspaper’s editorial redundantly praised Biden and bashed Trump. It concluded with the idea that the country would be better off without Trump running for president. 

“There was only one person at the debate who does not deserve to be running for president,” the Inquirer’s editorial proclaimed. “The sooner Trump exits the stage, the better off the country will be.”

Reporter’s Notebook: Implications of a dip in consumer confidence thumbnail

Reporter’s Notebook: Implications of a dip in consumer confidence

Washington Examiner Economics Reporter Zachary Halaschak joins Magazine Executive Editor Jim Antle to discuss the implications of a dip in consumer confidence, former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan‘s economic plan, and whether the Republican Senate candidate, who is campaigning to represent a blue state, could be open to coalition building.

The Debrief with Hugo Gurdon: Federal government’s censorship authority attacks First Amendment thumbnail

The Debrief with Hugo Gurdon: Federal government’s censorship authority attacks First Amendment

Washington Examiner Investigations Editor Sarah Bedford joins Editor-in-Chief Hugo Gurdon to discuss the Supreme Court not capitalizing on weakening the federal government’s censorship authority, the Global Disinformation Index, and whether the federal government’s authority in censorship will get worse.